首页> 外文OA文献 >The European Patterns of 'Homo Academicus“ and The Chances of Its Evolution In Current Hungarian Higher Education
【2h】

The European Patterns of 'Homo Academicus“ and The Chances of Its Evolution In Current Hungarian Higher Education

机译:在当今匈牙利高等教育中,“学术人”的欧洲模式及其演变的机会

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the recent four or five years, there have been abrupt and radical changes in the governance of Hungarian higher education. It can then be interesting to assess the state of “homo academicus“ as it looks currently in Hungary. The notion of “homo academicus“ is obvious: it concerns participants in the system of a country’s higher education. The paper as follows still comes back to the definition of “homo academicus“ by referring first to it as occupation, or rather as a profession that can be interpreted in terms of sociology. Secondly, some historic patterns can also be mobilised, based on the assumption that university is a very European institutions that is even rooted in the tradition of the Middle Ages.udThe elbow-room of seeking for identity and the role to be filled by academics are limited by the effective system of the governance of higher education. It is a key to the chances of academics of meeting the historically corroborated professional standards that they exercise academic freedom. As it cannot be done individually, but in cooperation (through a collegial system), academic freedom is always combined with collective action. The field where this freedom can be exercised can be specified through university autonomy, the lack of which makes a serious barrier to the full development of a character of “homo academicus“. This is now the case in Hungary, the paper suggests.udThe paper seeks to gain deeper understanding of the character of academics, their vocation and professional roles, and the governance of higher education, serving as the environment for academic activity, by creating a conceptual framework. The paper is established on the results of sociological research and the experience of legal management, although it remains to be of theoretical nature. It criticises the current Hungarian situation of the governance of higher education, arguing for the reconstruction of university autonomy and financial stability. It also emphasises the importance of predictable regulations.
机译:在最近的四到五年中,匈牙利高等教育的管理方式发生了急剧而根本的变化。然后,评估匈牙利目前的“ homo Academicus”状态可能会很有趣。 “高等学术”的概念很明显:它涉及一个国家的高等教育系统的参与者。下文通过首先将其称为“职业”,或更确切地说是可以从社会学角度解释的职业,来重新回到“ homo Academicus”的定义。其次,基于大学是一个非常欧洲的机构,甚至植根于中世纪传统的假设,也可以动员一些历史模式。 ud寻求身份的肘部空间和学者将要扮演的角色受高等教育治理的有效体系限制。这是学者满足其行使学术自由的历史上公认的专业标准的机会的关键。由于它不能单独完成,而是可以合作(通过合议制),因此学术自由总是与集体行动相结合。可以通过大学自治来指定可以行使这种自由的领域,而这种自治的缺乏严重阻碍了“同质人”性格的全面发展。该论文建议匈牙利现在就是这种情况。 ud该论文旨在通过创建一个“学术活动环境”,来加深对学者的性格,他们的职业和专业角色以及高等教育管理的了解,这是学术活动的环境。概念框架。本文是基于社会学研究的结果和法律管理的经验而建立的,尽管它仍具有理论性质。它批评匈牙利高等教育管理的现状,主张重建大学自治和财政稳定。它还强调了可预见法规的重要性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Deák Dániel;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号