首页> 外文OA文献 >No Identical 'Mesenchymal Stem Cells' at Different Times and Sites: Human Committed Progenitors of Distinct Origin and Differentiation Potential Are Incorporated as Adventitial Cells in Microvessels
【2h】

No Identical 'Mesenchymal Stem Cells' at Different Times and Sites: Human Committed Progenitors of Distinct Origin and Differentiation Potential Are Incorporated as Adventitial Cells in Microvessels

机译:在不同的时间和地点没有相同的“间充质干细胞”:人类承诺的不同起源和分化潜能的祖细胞被整合为微血管中的辅助细胞

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A widely shared view reads that mesenchymal stem/stromal cells ("MSCs") are ubiquitous in human connective tissues, can be defined by a common in vitro phenotype, share a skeletogenic potential as assessed by in vitro differentiation assays, and coincide with ubiquitous pericytes. Using stringent in vivo differentiation assays and transcriptome analysis, we show that human cell populations from different anatomical sources, regarded as "MSCs" based on these criteria and assumptions, actually differ widely in their transcriptomic signature and in vivo differentiation potential. In contrast, they share the capacity to guide the assembly of functional microvessels in vivo, regardless of their anatomical source, or in situ identity as perivascular or circulating cells. This analysis reveals that muscle pericytes, which are not spontaneously osteochondrogenic as previously claimed, may indeed coincide with an ectopic perivascular subset of committed myogenic cells similar to satellite cells. Cord blood-derived stromal cells, on the other hand, display the unique capacity to form cartilage in vivo spontaneously, in addition to an assayable osteogenic capacity. These data suggest the need to revise current misconceptions on the origin and function of so-called "MSCs," with important applicative implications. The data also support the view that rather than a uniform class of "MSCs," different mesoderm derivatives include distinct classes of tissue-specific committed progenitors, possibly of different developmental origin.
机译:一种广泛共享的观点认为,间充质干/基质细胞(“ MSCs”)在人的结缔组织中普遍存在,可以通过体外表型共同定义,具有通过体外分化测定法评估的具有成骨潜能,并且与普遍存在的周细胞一致。使用严格的活体分化测定和转录组分析,我们显示了来自不同解剖学来源的人类细胞群体(基于这些标准和假设被视为``MSC'')实际上在转录组签名和活体分化潜力方面存在很大差异。相反,无论其解剖来源如何,或与血管周围或循环细胞原位相同,它们都具有引导功能性微血管在体内组装的能力。该分析表明,肌肉周细胞并非如先前所声称的那样自发成骨,可能确实与定型成肌细胞的异位血管周亚群相吻合,类似于卫星细胞。另一方面,脐带血来源的基质细胞除了具有可测定的成骨能力外,还具有自发形成软骨的独特能力。这些数据表明有必要修正对所谓“ MSC”起源和功能的当前误解,具有重要的应用意义。数据还支持这样的观点,即不同的中胚层衍生物不是一类统一的“ MSC”,而是包括不同类别的组织特异性定型祖细胞,可能具有不同的发育起源。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号