首页> 外文OA文献 >Multi-level governance of climate change in Belgium. Modest subnational policies in a complex setting
【2h】

Multi-level governance of climate change in Belgium. Modest subnational policies in a complex setting

机译:比利时气候变化的多层次治理。复杂环境下的适度地方政策

摘要

This paper analyzes subnational climate policies in Belgium as a crucial case of multi-level policy-making in Europe. In Belgian federalism, the subnational governments have a large autonomy to conduct their own climate policies, while the scope to act at the federal level is very limited. Moreover, the federal system had produced complex and ineffective coordination patterns, where the federal and the subnational governments each have the possibility to block agreements, e.g. on the intra-Belgian burden sharing of the EU 20-20-20 targets.The paper demonstrates that, despite their large autonomy, the climate policies of Flanders, Wallonia and Brussels have shown only modest ambitions so far and that they lack a long-term vision. Because of an ongoing political stalemate in Belgium, the subnational governments lack the targets that should guide their new climate policy plans. An additional difficulty is the increasingly strong political divide between conservative and progressive political parties on climate change. The divide opposes Flanders, with a conservative Environment minister, to the other Belgian governments, where the Environment portfolio is held by green or socialist ministers. Since the issue is politically sensitive, it hijacks the mechanisms of intergovernmental cooperation and even prevents Belgium from taking a position in European and global decision-making bodies.It is concluded that the Belgian subnational governments, although they have multiple assets for bottom-up innovation, are no laboratories of experimentation. A partial reason is the complex multi-level architecture and its slow decision-making procedures. But it is also due to an overall lack of political will. The latter is reinforced by the particular institutional setting, which entails no leverages to force the subnational governments into a more ambitious role and thus impedes innovation. As a result, Belgian climate policies uphold a status quo.
机译:本文分析了比利时的次国家气候政策,将其作为欧洲多层次决策的重要案例。在比利时的联邦制中,地方政府有很大的自主权来执行自己的气候政策,而在联邦一级采取行动的范围非常有限。此外,联邦系统产生了复杂而无效的协调模式,在这种模式下,联邦政府和地方政府各有可能阻碍协议的达成,例如:关于欧盟20-20-20目标在比利时内部的负担分担。该文件表明,尽管法兰德斯,瓦隆大区和布鲁塞尔的气候政策具有很大的自治权,但迄今为止它们仅表现出了较小的野心,并且缺乏长期的目标。长期视野。由于比利时持续的政治僵局,地方政府缺乏应指导其新气候政策计划的目标。另一个困难是,保守派和进步派政党在气候变化问题上的政治分歧越来越大。这种分歧使法兰德斯与其他保守的环境部长对立,反对其他比利时政府,后者的环境投资组合由绿色或社会主义部长持有。由于该问题在政治上敏感,因此它劫持了政府间合作机制,甚至阻止比利时在欧洲和全球决策机构中占据一席之地。结论是,比利时地方政府尽管拥有自下而上的创新能力,但拥有多种资产,不是实验实验室。部分原因是复杂的多层体系结构及其缓慢的决策过程。但这也是由于总体上缺乏政治意愿。后者通过特殊的机构设置得到加强,没有任何手段迫使地方政府发挥更大的作用,从而阻碍了创新。结果,比利时的气候政策维持了现状。

著录项

  • 作者

    Happaerts Sander;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号