首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative breeding ecology of Lesser Sandhill Cranes (Grus canadensis canadensis) and Siberian cranes (G. leucogeranus) in Eastern Siberia
【2h】

Comparative breeding ecology of Lesser Sandhill Cranes (Grus canadensis canadensis) and Siberian cranes (G. leucogeranus) in Eastern Siberia

机译:西伯利亚东部小沙丘鹤(Grus canadensis canadensis)和西伯利亚鹤(G. leucogeranus)的比较繁殖生态

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Populations of Lesser Sandhill Crane (Grus canadensis canadensis) have beenincreasing during the last decades in Eastern Siberia, an area historically known asbreeding grounds of endangered Siberian Cranes (G. leucogeranus). Significant overlapin niche dimensions between the two species may occur and could lead to competitionbetween them. Therefore, this study of comparative breeding ecology of commonLesser Sandhill Cranes and endangered Siberian Cranes was performed.From late May to early August 2000, I studied Lesser Sandhill and Siberian craneswithin a 30,000-ha part of Kytalyk Resource Reserve in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia),Russia. My main objective was to compare dispersion patterns and resource use ofbreeding Lesser Sandhill and Siberian cranes in areas of distribution overlap.Lesser Sandhill Cranes used moderate-wet (polygon) areas as their nest sites andmain foraging areas, where terrestrial foods were scattered. In contrast, Siberian Craneswere nesting and foraging on low-basin wet areas, where aquatic foods were concentrated and dominant. Inter-nest distances were less for heterospecific cranes thanfor conspecific cranes, and more territorial behavior was projected toward conspecificsthan toward heterospecifics. Lesser Sandhill Cranes were more mobile and usedmoderate-wet (polygon) areas more than Siberian Cranes; however, both species spentsimilar time foraging and being alert.The two crane species used different vegetation types for nesting and foraging,had different time-activity budgets, and used different resources in the Siberian tundra.While the population of Lesser Sandhill Cranes in the study area has the potential toincrease, both species may simultaneously share the same geographic area due todifferences in ecological requirements.
机译:在过去的几十年中,西伯利亚东部的小沙丘鹤(Grus canadensis canadensis)的种群一直在增加,该地区历史上被称为濒临灭绝的西伯利亚鹤(G. leucogeranus)的繁殖地。这两个物种之间可能会在生态位上发生明显的重叠,并可能导致它们之间的竞争。因此,开展了对普通小沙丘鹤和濒危西伯利亚鹤的比较繁殖生态学的研究.2000年5月下旬至2000年8月初,我在萨哈共和国(雅库特)Kytalyk资源保护区30,000公顷的一部分内研究了小沙丘鹤和西伯利亚鹤。 ),俄国。我的主要目的是比较分布重叠区域的小沙丘鹤和西伯利亚鹤的繁殖模式和资源利用情况。小沙丘鹤以中等湿(多边形)区域为巢点和主要觅食区域,这些区域散布着陆生食物。相比之下,西伯利亚鹤在低水域潮湿的地区筑巢和觅食,那里的水产食品集中且占主导地位。异种起重机的巢间距离比同种起重机小,并且对异种的领土行为预计比异种起重机更多。较小的Sandhill起重机比西伯利亚起重机更容易移动,使用中湿(多边形)区域的次数更多。然而,两种鹤类在觅食和警觉上花费的时间相似。两种鹤类使用不同的植被类型进行筑巢和觅食,具有不同的时间活动预算,并且在西伯利亚冻土带使用不同的资源。面积有增加的潜力,由于生态需求的差异,两个物种可能同时共享同一地理区域。

著录项

  • 作者

    Watanabe Tsuyoshi;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号