首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparative analysis of numerical simulation and analytical modeling of horizontal well cyclic steam injection
【2h】

A comparative analysis of numerical simulation and analytical modeling of horizontal well cyclic steam injection

机译:水平井循环注汽数值模拟与解析模型的对比分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The main objective of this research is to compare the performance of cyclic steam injection using horizontal wells based on the analytical model developed by Gunadi against that based on numerical simulation. For comparison, a common reservoir model was used. The reservoir model measured 330 ft long by 330 ft wide by 120 ft thick, representing half of a 5-acre drainage area, and contained oil based on the properties of the Bachaquero-01 reservoir (Venezuela). Three steam injection cycles were assumed, consisting of a 20-day injection period at 1500 BPDCWE (half-well), followed by a 10-day soak period, and a 180-day production period. Comparisons were made for two cases of the position of the horizontal well located on one side of the reservoir model: at mid-reservoir height and at reservoir base. The analytical model of Gunadi had to be modified before a reasonable agreement with simulation results could be obtained. Main modifications were as follows. First, the cold horizontal well productivity index was modified to that based on the Economides-Joshi model instead of that for a vertical well. Second, in calculating the growth of the steam zone, the end-point relative permeability??s of steam and oil were taken into consideration, instead of assuming them to be the same (as in the original model of Gunadi). Main results of the comparative analysis for both cases of horizontal well positions are as follows. First, the water production rates are in very close agreement with results obtained from simulation. Second, the oil production rates based on the analytical model (averaging 46,000 STB), however, are lower than values obtained from simulation (64,000 STB). This discrepancy is most likely due to the fact that the analytical model assumes residual oil saturation in the steam zone, while there is moveable oil based on the simulation model. Nevertheless, the analytical model may be used to give a first-pass estimate of the performance of cyclic steam injection in horizontal wells, prior to conducting more detailed thermal reservoir simulation.
机译:这项研究的主要目的是比较基于Gunadi开发的分析模型的水平井循环蒸汽注入的性能与基于数值模拟的性能。为了进行比较,使用了通用的油藏模型。该油藏模型的长度为330英尺,宽为330英尺,宽为120英尺,代表了5英亩的排水面积的一半,并根据Bachaquero-01油藏(委内瑞拉)的性质含油。假设三个蒸汽注入周期,包括在1500 BPDCWE(半井)下的20天注入期,随后的10天浸泡期和180天生产期。对位于油藏模型一侧的水平井位置的两种情况进行了比较:在油藏中部高度和在油藏底部。必须先修改Gunadi的分析模型,然后才能与仿真结果取得合理的共识。主要修改如下。首先,将冷水平井生产率指数修改为基于Economides-Joshi模型的指数,而不是垂直井指数。第二,在计算蒸汽带的增长时,考虑了蒸汽和油的端点相对渗透率Δs,而不是假设它们是相同的(与古纳迪的原始模型相同)。两种水平井位置的对比分析的主要结果如下。首先,产水率与模拟结果非常接近。其次,基于分析模型的产油率(平均为46,000 STB)低于模拟获得的值(64,000 STB)。这种差异最有可能是由于以下事实:分析模型假设蒸汽区域中存在残余油饱和度,而基于模拟模型存在可移动的油。然而,在进行更详细的储层模拟之前,可以使用分析模型对水平井中循环蒸汽注入的性能进行一次通过评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号