首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of the effectiveness of analytical wake models for wind farm with constant and variable hub heights
【2h】

Comparison of the effectiveness of analytical wake models for wind farm with constant and variable hub heights

机译:具有恒定和可变轮毂高度的风电场分析尾流模型的有效性比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Extensive power losses of wind farm have been witnessed due to the wake interactions between wind turbines. By applying analytical wake models which describe the wind speed deficits in the wake quantitatively, the power losses can be regained to a large extent through wind farm layout optimization, and this has been extensively reported in literature. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of the analytical wake models in predicting the wind farm power production have rarely been studied and compared for wind farm with both constant and variable wind turbine hub heights. In this study, the effectiveness of three different analytical wake models (PARK model, Larsen model and B-P model) is thoroughly compared over a wide range of wake properties. After the validation with the observation data from offshore wind farm, CFD simulations are used to verify the effectiveness of the analytical wake models for an onshore wind farm. The results show that when using the PARK model the surface roughness value (z) must be carefully tuned to achieve good performance in predicting the wind farm power production. For the other two analytical wake models, their effectiveness varies depending on the situation of wind farm (offshore or onshore) and the wind turbine hub heights (constant or variable). It was found that the results of B-P model agree well with the CFD simulations for offshore wind farm, but not for the onshore wind farm. The Larsen model is more accurate for the wind farm with variable wind turbine hub heights than those with constant wind turbine hub height.
机译:由于风力涡轮机之间的唤醒相互作用,已经见证了风电场的广泛功率损失。通过在定量上施加描述风速缺陷的分析唤醒模型,可以通过风电场布局优化在很大程度上在很大程度上进行功率损耗,并且这在文献中被广泛报道。然而,对预测风电场生产的分析唤醒模型的有效性很少并比较有恒定和可变风力涡轮机枢纽高度的风电场。在这项研究中,在各种唤醒性能范围内彻底比较了三种不同分析唤醒模型(Park Model,Larsen Model和B-P型号)的有效性。在与海上风电场的观测数据验证后,CFD模拟用于验证陆上风电场的分析唤醒模型的有效性。结果表明,当使用公园型号时,必须仔细调整表面粗糙度值(Z),以实现预测风电场产量的良好性能。对于另外两个分析唤醒模型,它们的有效性根据风电场(海上或陆上)和风力涡轮机中心高度(恒定或可变)而异。结果发现,B-P模型的结果与海上风电场的CFD模拟相一致,但不适用于陆上风电场。 Larsen模型更准确地为风电场具有比具有恒定风力涡轮机枢纽高度的风力涡轮机枢纽高度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号