首页> 外文OA文献 >A pilot and comparative study between pathological and serological levels of immunoglobulin and complement among three kinds of primary glomerulonephritis
【2h】

A pilot and comparative study between pathological and serological levels of immunoglobulin and complement among three kinds of primary glomerulonephritis

机译:免疫球蛋白病理和血清素水平与三种原发性肾小球肾炎的血清素水平的试验和比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), membranous nephropathy (MN) and minimal-change disease (MCD) are three common types of glomerulonephritis in China. Pathological diagnosis based on renal biopsy is the criterion and the golden standard for diagnosing the sub-types of primary or secondary glomerulonephritis. Immunoglobulin and complements might be used in the differential diagnosis of glomerulonephritis without renal biopsies. However, the relationship between IF intensities of immune proteins and the corresponding serum levels remained unclear, and seldom studies combine histopathological examination results and blood tests together for a predictive purpose. This study was considered as a pilot study for integrating histopathological indicators into serum parameters for exploring the relationship of IF intensity and serum values of immunoglobulin and complement, and for screening and investigating effective indicators inIgAN, MN and MCD. Methods Renal tissue immunofluorescence (IF) intensity grades and serum levels of immunoglobulin and complements (IgG, IgA, IgM, C3 and C4) were retrospectively analyzed in 236 cases with IgAN, MN or MCD. IF grades were grouped as negative (−), positive (+) or strong positive (++) with both high and low magnification of microscope. Other serum indicators such as urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Crea) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were also evaluated among the groups. Results There were difference in IgA, IgG and C3 IF intensity grades among IgAN, MN and MCD groups (p = 9.82E-43, 4.60E-39, 7.45E-15, respectively). Serum values of BUN, Crea, eGFR, IgG, IgA, IgM and C4 showed difference in three groups (BUN: p = 0.045, Crea: p = 3.45E-5, eGFR: p = 0.005, IgG: p = 1.68E-14, IgA: p = 9.14E-9, IgM: p = 0.014, C4: p = 0.026). eGFR had the trend to decrease with enhanced IgA IF positive grades (p = 8.99E-4); Crea had trends to decrease with both enhanced IgA and IgG IF intensity grades (p = 2.06E-6, 2.94E-5, respectively). In all subjects, serum IgA levels was inversely correlated with eGFR(r = − 0.216, p = 0.001) and correlated with Crea levels(r = 0.189, p = 0.004); serum IgG and Crea showed no correlation which were discordance with inverse correlation of IgG IF grade and Crea(r = 0.058,p = 0.379). IgG serum level was inverse correlated with its IF grades (p = 3.54E-5, p = 7.08E-6, respectively); C3 serum levels had significantly difference between Neg and positive (+) group (p = 0.0003). IgA serum level was positive correlated with its IF grades (Neg-(+): p = 0.0001; (+)-(++): p = 0.022; Neg-(++): p = 2.01E-10). After matching comparison among C3 groups, C3 Neg. group and C3 ++ group had difference (*p = 0.017). C4 had all negative IF expression in all pathological groups. In IgAN subjects, there were statistical differences of serum C3 levels between its pathological Neg and positive (+) group(p = 0.026), and serum IgA levels showed difference between IgA pathological positive(+) and (++)(p = 0.007). In MN subjects, sIgG levels showed difference between IgG pathological IF grade positive (+) and (++)(p = 0.044); serum C3 levels showed difference between C3 pathological IF grade Neg and positive(+)(p = 0.005); and serum IgA levels showed difference between Neg and positive(+)(p = 0.040). In IgAN, eGFR showed serum IgA levels had significant differences among groups (p = 0.007) and had increasing trend with enhanced its IF grades(Ptrend = 0.016). There were also difference between IgG group Neg and positive (+) (p = 0.005, Ptrend = 0.007) in IgAN. In MN, serum IgG levels had significant differences among IF groups (p = 0.034) and had decreasing trend with its enhanced IF grades (Ptrend = 0.014). Serum C3 concentrations also were found distinctive among IF groups (p = 0.016) and had in inverse correlation with its enhanced IF grades (Ptrend = 0.004). Discussion Our research cross contrasts several immunoprotein IF intensities and relevant serum levels in three kinds of primary glomerular nephritis, and finally acquired helpful results for understanding the relationships between pathological presentation and serological presentation of immunoproteins in kidney diseases. Furthermore, this pilot study is offering a possible method for the analysis of combination of pathology and serology. Conclusion Different pathological types of nephritis presented different expression patterns of immunoglobulin and complement, especially IgA and IgG, which suggested different pathogenesis involved in the development of IgAN and MN. Furthermore, either in tissue or in serum, increased IgA level was closely related with renal function in all of the patients.
机译:摘要背景免疫球蛋白A肾病(IgA肾病),膜性肾病(MN)和微小病变肾病(MCD)三种常见类型的肾小球肾炎中国的。基于肾活检病理诊断为准则和用于诊断的子类型伯或继发性肾小球肾炎的黄金标准。免疫球蛋白和补体可能在肾小球肾炎的鉴别诊断无肾活组织检查中使用。然而,免疫蛋白的IF强度和相应的血清水平之间的关系尚不清楚,也很少研究与预测目的结合病理组织学检查结果和验血在一起。该研究被认为是用于集成组织病理学指标进入血清参数探索IF强度和血清值的免疫球蛋白和补体的方法以及用于筛选和调查有效的指标inIgAN,MN和MCD的关系的试验性研究。方法肾组织的免疫荧光(IF)强度等级和免疫球蛋白和补体(IgG抗体,IgA的,IgM抗体,C3和C4)的血清水平进行回顾性分析236例IgA肾病,MN或MCD。 IF等级被分组为负( - ),正(+)或强阳性(++)同时具有高和显微镜的低倍。其它血清指标如尿素氮(BUN),肌酸酐(克雷亚)和估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)也各组间进行评价。结果有IgA肾病,MN和MCD组间的IgA,IgG和C3 IF强度等级差异(p = 9.82E-43,4.60E-39,7.45E-15,分别地)。 BUN,克雷亚,EGFR,的IgG,IgA的血清值,IgM和C4表现出三组(BUN差异:P = 0.045,克雷亚:P = 3.45E-5,EGFR:P = 0.005,IgG的:P = 1.68E- 14,IgA的:p = 9.14E-9,IgM的:p = 0.014,C4:p = 0.026)。表皮生长因子受体有具有增强的IgA IF正等级(p值= 8.99E-4)以降低的趋势; CREA有趋势既增强IgA和IgG IF强度等级(p值= 2.06E-6,2.94E-5,分别地)降低。在所有受试者中,血清IgA水平呈负与eGFR相关(r = - 0.216,P = 0.001),并用克雷亚水平相关(r = 0.189,P = 0.004);血清IgG和克雷亚显示没有相关性,其分别为不一致用IgG IF级和克雷亚性(r = 0.058,P = 0.379)的逆相关。 IgG血清水平逆与其IF等级相关性(p = 3.54E-5,P = 7.08E-6,分别地); C3血清水平有负极性和正(+)组(p = 0.0003)之间显著差异。与它的IF分级相关的IgA血清水平为正(负 - (+):P = 0.0001;(+) - (++):P = 0.022;负片 - (++):P = 2.01E-10)。后C3组,C3负片之间的匹配性比较。基和C3 ++组有差异(* P = 0.017)。 C4已经在所有病理组全部阴性IF表达式。 IgA的病理正(+)和(++)(对之间在IgA肾病的受试者,有其病理负片和正(+)组之间血清C3水平的统计学差异(p = 0.026),和血清型IgA水平显示差= 0.007 )。在MN的受试者,特异性IgG水平显示有IgG病理之间差IF级正(+)和(++)(P = 0.044);血清C3水平显示C3病理之间差IF级负片和阳性(+)(P = 0.005);和血清IgA水平显示负片和正(+)之间的差异(p = 0.040)。在IgA肾病,EGFR表明血清IgA水平有组之间(P = 0.007)显著差异,并与增强其IF级(Ptrend = 0.016)增加的趋势。也有在IgA肾病负片的IgG组和阳性(+)(P = 0.005,Ptrend = 0.007)之间的差异。在MN,血清IgG水平有间显著差异IF组(P = 0.034),并降低了与其增强的IF级(Ptrend = 0.014)的趋势。血清浓度C3还发现之间独特的IF组(P = 0.016),并用其增强的IF级(Ptrend = 0.004)具有逆相关。讨论我们的研究交叉对比几种免疫蛋白IF的强度和3种原发性肾小球肾炎,最后获得有用的搜索结果相关的血清水平为了解病理表现和肾脏疾病immunoproteins的血清学表现之间的关系。此外,该试验性研究是提供用于病理和血清学的组合的分析的可能方法。结论不同病理类型肾炎的呈现免疫球蛋白和补体的不同的表达模式,尤其是IgA和IgG,这表明涉及IgA肾病和MN的发展不同发病机制。此外,无论是在组织或血清中,增加的IgA水平与所有的患者肾功能有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号