首页> 外文OA文献 >Conversion to organic and biodynamic viticultural practices: impact on soil, grapevine development and grape quality
【2h】

Conversion to organic and biodynamic viticultural practices: impact on soil, grapevine development and grape quality

机译:转换为有机和生物动力学葡萄栽培实践:对土壤,葡萄开发和葡萄品质的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aim: The effects of integrated, organic and biodynamic management on soil quality and the growth and morphological development of Riesling grapevines were assessed during the first 4 years of a long-term field trial in Geisenheim, Germany. The overall aim was to understand the effects of these different viticultural practices on soil quality and plant morphology as the basis for product quality.Methods and results: As indicators of soil quality, earthworm abundance and the activity of selected enzymes were assessed. The vegetative and reproductive development of the grapevines, as well as their susceptibility to fungal diseases in the field, wood and grape composition, and grape yield, were investigated. Individual variables were subjected to analysis of variance. Additionally, all variables were subjected to multivariate principal component analysis. Compared with plots under integrated management, plots under the two biological treatments were characterized by higher soil quality and lower vegetative growth and grape yield, and therefore higher exposure of grapes and lower grape cluster compactness, and, probably as a result of these morphological differences, lower incidence of acetic acid rot. Principal component analysis clearly differentiated the three treatments, and showed that biodynamic management had more pronounced effects than organic management in terms of enhanced soil fertility and reduction of vegetative growth.Conclusions: In the present study, organic and especially biodynamic management resulted in a morphology favouring production of high-quality grapes. The treatments differed in terms of fertilization and plant protection methods as well as choice of cover crops. Therefore, further research is necessary with respect to root growth and the nitrogen and water uptake dynamics of vines and cover crops. The differences between grapes produced under organic and biodynamic management emphasize the need for more research on the mode of action of biodynamic preparations.Significance and impact of the study: In recent years, both winegrowers and consumers have expressed steadily growing interest in organic and especially biodynamic wine production. The present study contributes to a better understanding of the effects on grapevine growth and morphological development of shifting to these methods as a way to increase product quality.
机译:目的:在德国Geisenheim的前4年期间,评估了综合,有机和生物动力管理对土壤质量和林蛙葡萄的生长和形态学和形态学发展的影响。总体目标是了解这些不同葡萄栽培实践对土壤质量和植物形态的影响,作为产品质量的基础。方法和结果:作为土壤质量的指标,评估蚯蚓丰富和所选酶的活性。研究了葡萄藤的植物和生殖开发,以及对田间,木材和葡萄组合物的真菌疾病,葡萄产量的易感性。对各个变量进行异常分析。另外,对所有变量进行多变量主成分分析。与综合管理下的图相比,两种生物处理下的地块以较高的土壤质量和较低的营养生长和葡萄产率较低,因此葡萄葡萄和较低的葡萄簇致密度,并且可能是由于这些形态学差异,而且,较低的乙酸腐蚀发病率。主要成分分析清楚地分化了三种治疗,并表明,在提高土壤肥力和营养生长的减少方面,生物动力管理比有机管理更明显的效果。结论:在目前的研究中,有机和尤其是生物动力学管理导致形态有利生产高品质葡萄。该治疗在施肥和植物保护方法方面不同以及封面作物的选择。因此,关于根生长和葡萄植物的氮气和水摄取动力学是必要的进一步研究。在有机和生物动力学管理下产生的葡萄之间的差异强调了对生物动力学制剂的作用方式的需要。近年来,近年来,葡萄酒和消费者都表达了对有机和尤其是生物动力的兴趣稳步增长葡萄酒生产。本研究有助于更好地理解对这些方法转移的葡萄生长和形态学发展的影响,作为提高产品质量的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号