首页> 外文OA文献 >Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis
【2h】

Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis

机译:倒置内部限制膜皮瓣技术与vitrectomy在高度近视眼中的内部限制膜剥离,具有黄斑孔诱导的视网膜脱离:更新的荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare morphological and functional outcomes between vitrectomy with the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling in highly myopic eyes with macular hole- (MH-) induced retinal detachment (MHRD). Methods. The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were comprehensively searched from inception to November 10, 2019, for published studies comparing the two techniques for the treatment of MHRD. The outcomes in the collected articles included the postoperative MH closure rate, retinal reattachment rate, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Review Manager (version 5.3) was used for analyses. Results. In total, seven retrospective studies comparing the inverted ILM flap technique with ILM peeling for the treatment of MHRD were included. The MH closure rate was significantly higher in the inverted ILM flap group than in the ILM peeling group at 6 and 12 months after initial surgery (OR = 15.39; 95% CI: 6.68 to 35.43;P<0.00001 and OR = 12.58, 95% CI: 3.51 to 45.08; P=0.0001), while the retinal reattachment rate was similar in both groups at 6 months after initial surgery (OR = 2.40; 95% CI: 0.89 to 6.50; P=0.08). Besides, the postoperative BCVA was significantly better in the inverted ILM flap group than in the ILM peeling group at 12 months after initial surgery (MD = −0.35; 95% CI: −0.52 to −0.18; P<0.0001). Conclusions. Thus, the MH closure rate and postoperative BCVA may be better with the inverted ILM flap technique than with ILM peeling for myopic MHRD, while the postoperative retinal reattachment rate appears to be similar with both techniques. Therefore, in the future, vitrectomy with the inverted ILM flap technique should be preferred over standard ILM peeling technique for the treatment of MHRD in highly myopic eyes.
机译:背景。该荟萃分析的目的是将玻璃体切除与倒置的内部限制膜(ILM)皮瓣技术和玻璃体切除在高度近视眼中剥落的玻璃体切除术和玻璃体切除与黄斑 - (MH-)诱导的视网膜脱离( MHRD)。方法。从2009年11月10日开始,全面搜查了PubMed,Empase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,从2019年11月10日开始,对于比较MHRD的两种技术的出版研究,从2009年11月10日开始。收集的物品中的结果包括术后MH闭合速率,视网膜重新定位率和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。 Review Manager(版本5.3)用于分析。结果。还包括总共七种回顾性研究,将倒置的ILM皮瓣技术与ILM剥离进行剥离进行剥离治疗MHRD。在初始手术后6和12个月的倒ILM皮瓣组中MH闭合率明显高于ILM剥皮组(或= 15.39; 95%CI:6.68至35.43; P <0.00001和或= 12.58,95% CI:3.51至45.08; p = 0.0001),而在初始手术后6个月(或= 2.40; 95%Ci:0.89至6.50; p = 0.08),两组在两组中的视网膜重新定位率相似。此外,在初始手术后12个月(MD = -0.35; 95%CI:-0.52至-0.18; P <0.01),术后BCVA在倒ILM皮瓣组中比在ILM剥皮组中显着更好。结论。因此,MH闭合速率和术后BCVA可能与倒ILM皮瓣技术更好,而不是近视近视MHRD的ILM剥离,而术后视网膜重新连接率似乎与两种技术相似。因此,在未来,对倒置的ILM皮瓣技术的蒸发术应优先于标准ILM剥离技术,用于治疗高度近视眼中的MHRD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号