首页> 外文OA文献 >Monitoring of muscle mass in critically ill patients: comparison of ultrasound and two bioelectrical impedance analysis devices
【2h】

Monitoring of muscle mass in critically ill patients: comparison of ultrasound and two bioelectrical impedance analysis devices

机译:严重病患者的肌肉肿块监测:超声波和两种生物电阻抗分析装置的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Skeletal muscle atrophy commonly occurs in critically ill patients, and decreased muscle mass is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Muscle mass can be assessed using various tools, including ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). However, the effectiveness of muscle mass monitoring is unclear in critically ill patients. This study was conducted to compare ultrasound and BIA for the monitoring of muscle mass in critically ill patients. Methods We recruited adult patients who were expected to undergo mechanical ventilation for > 48 h and to remain in the intensive care unit (ICU) for > 5 days. On days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10, muscle mass was evaluated using an ultrasound and two BIA devices (Bioscan: Malton International, England; Physion: Nippon Shooter, Japan). The influence of fluid balance was also evaluated between each measurement day. Results We analyzed 93 images in 21 patients. The age of the patients was 69 (interquartile range, IQR, 59–74) years, with 16 men and 5 women. The length of ICU stay was 11 days (IQR, 9–25 days). The muscle mass, monitored by ultrasound, decreased progressively by 9.2% (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.9–12.5%), 12.7% (95% CI, 9.3–16.1%), 18.2% (95% CI, 14.7–21.6%), and 21.8% (95% CI, 17.9–25.7%) on days 3, 5, 7, and 10 (p <  0.01), respectively, with no influence of fluid balance (r = 0.04, p = 0.74). The muscle mass did not decrease significantly in both the BIA devices (Bioscan, p = 0.14; Physion, p = 0.60), and an influence of fluid balance was observed (Bioscan, r = 0.37, p <  0.01; Physion, r = 0.51, p <  0.01). The muscle mass assessment at one point between ultrasound and BIA was moderately correlated (Bioscan, r = 0.51, p <  0.01; Physion, r = 0.37, p <  0.01), but the change of muscle mass in the same patient did not correlate between these two devices (Bioscan, r = − 0.05, p = 0.69; Physion, r = 0.23, p = 0.07). Conclusions Ultrasound is suitable for sequential monitoring of muscle atrophy in critically ill patients. Monitoring by BIA should be carefully interpreted owing to the influence of fluid change. Trial registration UMIN000031316. Retrospectively registered on 15 February 2018.
机译:摘要背景骨骼肌萎缩常见于重症患者,降低肌肉质量与更差的临床结果。肌肉质量可以使用各种工具,包括超声和生物电阻抗分析(BIA)评估。然而,肌肉质量监控的有效性是危重患者不清楚。本研究的目的是比较超声波和BIA对危重病人的监测肌肉质量。方法:我们招募谁被预期会经历机械通气> 48小时,并继续留在重症监护病房(ICU)为>5天成年患者。 (:;:日本射手,日本Physion莫尔顿国际,英国Bioscan的)在第1天,3,5,7,10,肌肉质量,使用超声波和两个BIA设备进行评价。流体平衡的影响也被每个测量日之间进行评价。结果我们在21个例分析93个图像。患者的年龄为69(四分位距,IQR,59-74岁),有16名男性和5名女性。入住ICU的长度为11天(IQR,9-25天)。肌肉质量,监视通过超声波,9.2%(95%置信区间(CI),5.9-12.5%),12.7%(95%CI,9.3-16.1%),18.2%(95%CI,逐步减少14.7- 21.6%),并在3天,5,7 21.8%(95%CI,17.9-25.7%),和10(p <0.01),分别用没有体液平衡的影响(R = 0.04,p = 0.74) 。肌肉质量并没有在BIA设备都显著减少(Bioscan的,P = 0.14; Physion,p值= 0.60),并观察液体平衡的影响(Bioscan的,R = 0.37,P <0.01; Physion,R = 0.51 ,p <0.01)。在超声和BIA之间的一个点处的肌肉质量评估是适度相关(Bioscan的,R = 0.51,P <0.01; Physion中,r = 0.37,P <0.01),但肌肉量在同一病人的变化没之间相关成分这两个装置(Bioscan的,R = - 0.05,p = 0.69; Physion中,r = 0.23,p = 0.07)。结论超声是适用于危重病人连续监测肌肉萎缩。通过BIA监测应仔细解释由于流体变化的影响。临床试验注册UMIN000031316。回顾2018注册2月15日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号