首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparing the Performance of Predictive Models Constructed Using the Techniques of Feed-Forword and Generalized Regression Neural Networks
【2h】

Comparing the Performance of Predictive Models Constructed Using the Techniques of Feed-Forword and Generalized Regression Neural Networks

机译:比较使用前馈技术和广义回归神经网络技术构建的预测模型的性能

摘要

Artificial Neural Network (ANNs) is an efficient machine learning method that can be used to fits model from data for prediction purposes. It is capable of modelling theudclass prediction as a nonlinear combination of the inputs. However, a number of factors may affect the accuracy of the model created using this approach. The choice of network type and how the network is optimally configured plays important role in the performance of a predictive model created using neural network techniques. This paper compares the accuracy of two typical neural network techniques used for creating a predictive model. The techniques are feed-forward neural network and theudgeneralized regression networks. The model created using both techniques are evaluated for correctness. The resulting outputs show that, the Generalized RegressionudNeural Network (GRNN) consistently produces a more accurate result. Findings further show that, the fitting of the network predictive model using the technique of Feed-forward Neural Network (FNN) records error value of 1.086 higher than the generalized regression network.ud
机译:人工神经网络(ANN)是一种有效的机器学习方法,可用于从数据中拟合模型以进行预测。它能够将 udclass预测建模为输入的非线性组合。但是,许多因素可能会影响使用此方法创建的模型的准确性。网络类型的选择以及网络的最佳配置方式在使用神经网络技术创建的预测模型的性能中起着重要作用。本文比较了用于创建预测模型的两种典型神经网络技术的准确性。这些技术是前馈神经网络和预算化回归网络。将评估使用这两种技术创建的模型的正确性。结果输出表明,广义回归神经网络(GRNN)始终产生更准确的结果。研究结果进一步表明,使用前馈神经网络(FNN)技术对网络预测模型进行拟合,记录的误差值比广义回归网络高1.086。 ud

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号