首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings >Selecting Modeling Techniques for Outcome Prediction: Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks Classification and Regression Trees and Linear Regression Analysis for Predicting Medical Rehabilitation Outcomes
【2h】

Selecting Modeling Techniques for Outcome Prediction: Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks Classification and Regression Trees and Linear Regression Analysis for Predicting Medical Rehabilitation Outcomes

机译:预测结果的建模技术选择:人工神经网络分类和回归树的比较以及用于预测医疗康复结果的线性回归分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A multitude of techniques exists for modeling medical outcomes. One problem for the researcher is how to select an appropriate modeling technique for a given task. This paper addresses the problem through: an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of three techniques; and, a case study in which the three techniques are applied to the task of predicting medical rehabilitation outcomes. The three techniques selected where linear regression analysis (LRA), classification and regression trees (CART) and artificial neural networks (ANN). The analysis illustrates that when the relationship between the independent and dependent variables is a linear one, that LRA is adequate. However, when a nonlinear relationship exists, CART or ANN analysis will yield better models. When a nonlinear, nonorthogonal relationship exists, then ANN analysis will yield a better model. The results of the case study show that the ANN model is more accurate than both LRA and CART in predicting the discharge motor FIM from admission data for stroke patients admitted to medical rehabilitation facilities. However, the increased accuracy comes at an increase in the computational cost of the model, thus a decision about which technique to use must be made by weighing the increased accuracy against the increased cost.
机译:存在用于模拟医学结果的多种技术。研究人员面临的一个问题是如何为给定任务选择适当的建模技术。本文通过以下方法解决了这个问题:分析三种技术的优缺点;案例研究,其中将三种技术应用于预测医疗康复结果的任务。在线性回归分析(LRA),分类和回归树(CART)和人工神经网络(ANN)中选择了这三种技术。分析表明,当自变量和因变量之间的关系是线性关系时,LRA就足够了。但是,当存在非线性关系时,CART或ANN分析将产生更好的模型。当存在非线性,非正交关系时,则ANN分析将产生一个更好的模型。案例研究的结果表明,ANN模型比LRA和CART更为准确,它可以根据入院医疗康复设施的中风患者的入院数据预测出院运动FIM。然而,增加的准确性伴随着模型的计算成本的增加,因此必须通过权衡增加的准确性和增加的成本来决定使用哪种技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号