首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of pigeonpea pod borer and pod fly tolerant lines at Kabete and Kiboko in Kenya
【2h】

Evaluation of pigeonpea pod borer and pod fly tolerant lines at Kabete and Kiboko in Kenya

机译:KENYA Kabee和Kiboko的Pigeonpea Pod Borer和Pod Play Platoration评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Pigeonpea lines which have shown tolerance to pod borer and pod fly damage at ICRISAT, Patancheru, India, were tested in the field at Kabete and Kiboko, Kenya, and compared with five local checks. There were sprayed and unsprayed plots for each line. Endosulfan 35 E.C. was applied at 0.07% active ingredient (a.i.) starting at flower bud expansion stage, at 50% flowering, early podding, and full podding stages. At crop maturity, all pods from three plants plot-1 were sampled and seed damage by different insect pests determined. The results showed that seeds from all lines were damaged by pod borers and pod sucking bugs. Pod fly incidence was greater at Kabete than at Kiboko, and damage was lower on test lines than on checks. Spraying reduced seed damage from 57.6% to 9.3% and from 59.9% to 4.5% on pod borer lines and pod fly lines, respectively, at Kiboko, and from 19.9% to 5.4% on pod fly lines at Kabete. At Kiboko seed damage in unsprayed pod borer (57.6%) and pod fly (59.9%) lines was similar. Seed damage on pod fly lines at Kiboko (59.9%) was significantly higher than at Kabete (19.9%). Positive significant correlations were observed between seed mass and pod fly damage at Kabete (r = 0.31*) and Kiboko (r = 0.30*). The results indicated that although some lines showed tolerance to pod borer and pod fly damage, they were highly susceptible to pod sucking bugs, suggesting that such tolerance does not hold against other insect groups.
机译:在印度帕特南德·帕特南德·哥伦萨·帕特南德(ICrisat)在Kabete和Kiboko,Kenya的领域测试了对Pod Borer和Pod Frey伤害的鸽皮线路在肯尼亚的田野中进行了测试,并与五个本地支票进行比较。每条线喷涂和未喷雾的图。在50%开花,早期荚和完全植入阶段,以0.07%的活性成分(A.I.)以0.07%的活性成分(A.I.)施用。在作物成熟时,来自三种植物的所有豆荚斑块-1是通过确定的不同昆虫害虫的采样和种子损伤。结果表明,来自所有线条的种子被豆荚和豆荚吸吮虫子损坏。 Pod Fly发病率大于Kabete而不是Kiboko,并且在测试线上的损伤低于检查。将种子损坏从57.6%喷洒至9.3%,分别在Kiboko的Pod Borer线和Pod飞行线上的59.9%至4.5%,从Kabete的Pod Fly Lines的19.9%到5.4%。在非喷壶种子损伤的kiboko种子损伤(57.6%)和豆荚(59.9%)线相似。 Kiboko(59.9%)对豆荚的种子损伤显着高于Kabete(19.9%)。在Kabete(R = 0.31 *)和Kiboko(R = 0.30 *)之间的种子质量和豆荚飞行损伤之间观察到阳性显着相关性。结果表明,虽然一些线条显示宽度钻孔和豆荚飞行损伤的耐受性,但它们非常容易受到豆荚吸吮虫子的影响,这表明这种耐受性不会抵抗其他昆虫群体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号