首页> 外文OA文献 >Use of balloon pull-through technique to assist in CardioSEAL device closure of patent foramen ovale
【2h】

Use of balloon pull-through technique to assist in CardioSEAL device closure of patent foramen ovale

机译:使用气球拉动技术来帮助Cardioseal设备闭合专利ovale

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

CardioSEAL device closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been advocated for the treatment of patients with cryptogenic stroke. Using the standard delivery technique, partial deployment of the CardioSEAL device can occur, especially in patients with a thick septum secundum and/or long PFO tunnel. We hypothesized that using a left atrial-to-right atrial balloon pull-through to make the septum primum incompetent would result in improved final device position regardless of septal thickness or tunnel length. Catheterization reports, cineangiograms, and transesophageal echocardiograms of 51 patients who underwent CardioSEAL device closure of PFO between March 2000 and August 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. Group 1 (n = 21) included patients with CardioSEAL placement using the standard technique and group 2 (n = 30) included patients with CardioSEAL placement using the balloon pull-through technique. There were no differences between the groups in terms of age (43.6 vs. 45.3 years; P = NS), weight (83.3 vs. 89.9 kg; P = NS), septum secundum thickness (6.4 vs. 7.0 mm; P = NS), PFO tunnel length (15.5 vs. 13.1 mm; P = NS), or device size. In group 1, 4/21 (19%) had partial deployment of the CardioSEAL device, while in group 2, no partial CardioSEAL deployment (0/30) was observed. No complications were associated with the balloon pull-through technique. We conclude that the left atrial-to-right atrial balloon pull-through technique is safe and may allow for better final position of the CardioSEAL device during PFO closure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;60:101–106. © 2003 Wiley–Liss, Inc.
机译:卵圆孔未闭(PFO)的CardioSEAL装置闭合已经主张对患者的治疗隐中风。使用标准的递送技术,可能出现CardioSEAL装置的部分部署,尤其是在患者用厚房间隔和/或长PFO隧道。我们假设,使用左心房到右心房球囊拉通,使原发隔无能将导致改善的最终装置位置,而不管室间隔厚度或隧道的长度。导尿报告,cineangiograms,和51例谁接受2000年3月和2002年8月之间PFO的CardioSEAL装置关闭食管超声心动图进行回顾性分析。组1(N = 21)包括患者CardioSEAL放置使用标准的技术和包括组2(n = 30)患者CardioSEAL放置使用气球拉通技术。有在年龄组间无显着差异(43.6对比45.3年; P = NS),重量(83.3对比89.9千克; P = NS),房间隔的厚度(6.4对比7.0毫米; P = NS) ,PFO隧道长度(15.5对比13.1毫米; P = NS),或设备的尺寸。在组1中,4/21(19%)具有CardioSEAL装置的部分展开,而在组2中,没有观察到局部CardioSEAL部署(0/30)。无并发症用气囊拉通技术相关。我们的结论是左房到右心房气球拉通技术是安全的,可允许PFO封堵期间CardioSEAL设备的更好的最终位置。导管心血管INTERV 2003; 60:101-106。 ©2003威利 - 利斯公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号