首页> 外文OA文献 >Exploring the Feasibility of Relapse Prevention Strategies in Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy Programs: Qualitative Study
【2h】

Exploring the Feasibility of Relapse Prevention Strategies in Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy Programs: Qualitative Study

机译:探索跨学科多模式疼痛治疗计划中复发防治策略的可行性:定性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundAlthough interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment (IMPT) programs are widely regarded as treatment of choice for patients with chronic pain, there are signs that many patients are unable to maintain their treatment gains in the long term. To facilitate the maintenance of positive treatment outcomes over time, we developed two relapse prevention strategies. ObjectiveThe main objective of this study was to explore the feasibility of these strategies within the context of IMPT programs. MethodsWe performed a feasibility study using 3 workbook prototypes containing either one or both strategies. For a period of 6 months, the workbooks were made available in two IMPT facilities. Qualitative data were collected through a focus group and semistructured interviews. We performed a thematic analysis using a deductive approach with (1) applicability to the treatment program, (2) acceptability of the workbook content, and (3) form, as predefined themes. ResultsThe final dataset consisted of transcripts from a focus group with health care providers and 11 telephone interviews and 2 additional in-depth interviews with patients. In general, the intervention was perceived as useful, easy to use, and in line with the treatment program. The data also include suggestions to further improve the use of both strategies, including more specific implementation guidelines, revised goal-setting procedure, and development of a mobile health version. However, several factors, including a high dropout rate and small sample size, impact the external validity of our findings. ConclusionsThis study should be regarded as a first step in the process of transforming the prototype workbook into an effective intervention for clinical practice. Although these initial results indicate a favorable evaluation of both behavior regulation strategies within the workbook, this study encountered multiple barriers regarding implementation and data collection that limit the generalizability of these results. Future research efforts should specifically address the fidelity of HCPs and patients and should include clear procedures regarding recruitment and use of both relapse prevention strategies during treatment.
机译:背景技术虽然跨学科多模式疼痛治疗(IMPT)计划被广泛认为对慢性疼痛患者的选择进行治疗,但存在许多患者在长期内无法维持其治疗率的迹象。为了便于维持阳性治疗结果随着时间的推移,我们开发了两种复发预防策略。客观本研究的主要目标是探讨这些战略在IMPT计划的背景下的可行性。方法使用包含一个或两种策略的3个工作簿原型进行了可行性研究。在6个月的时间内,工作簿是在两个IMPT设施中提供的。通过焦点组和半系统采访收集定性数据。我们使用Defuctive方法进行了主题分析,其中(1)适用于治疗计划,(2)工作簿内容的可接受性,(3)形式,作为预定义主题。结果SteSthe最终数据集由焦点小组的成绩单组成,带有医疗保健提供者和11个电话访谈和与患者的另外一份深入的访谈。一般而言,干预被认为是有用的,易于使用,并且符合治疗计划。这些数据还包括进一步改进两种策略使用的建议,包括更具体的实施指南,修订的目标设置程序以及移动卫生版的开发。然而,几个因素,包括高辍学率和小样本大小,影响我们发现的外部有效性。结论应该将研究视为将原型工作手册转换为临床实践的有效干预过程中的第一步。虽然这些初始结果表明工作簿中对行为监管策略的有利评估,但这项研究遇到了有关实施和数据收集的多个障碍,这些屏障限制了这些结果的概括性。未来的研究努力应具体解决HCP和患者的保真度,并应包括在治疗期间招聘和使用复发预防策略的明确程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号