首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >Effect of Additional Pain Neuroscience Education in Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy on Current Pain. A Non-Randomized, Controlled Intervention Study
【24h】

Effect of Additional Pain Neuroscience Education in Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy on Current Pain. A Non-Randomized, Controlled Intervention Study

机译:额外疼痛神经科学教育在跨学科多模式疼痛治疗目前疼痛的影响。一个非随机的受控干预研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose:Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) programs for chronic back pain are effective and recommended. The patient-centered and biopsychosocial nature of IMPT is grounded in contemporary understanding that chronic pain states reflect heightened sensitization of the nervous system rather than an issue in the tissue. Teaching patients about pain is part of IMPT programs, though a clinical guideline is lacking. This study aims to answer the following question: Does the addition of an evidence-based pain neuroscience education (PNE) lecture for patients, into an IMPT program, produce superior results than the IMPT program itself?Patients and Methods:A non-randomized, controlled intervention study was performed with 179 back pain patients indicated for IMPT. Intervention group (N=102) received a four-week IMPT program, which contained 4 one-hour sessions PNE. Control group (N=77) received the same IMPT without the additional PNE. Primary outcome was current pain after intervention. Pain knowledge, physical function, depression, anxiety, stress, quality of life and fear-avoidance were analyzed as secondary outcomes. Outcomes were defined as change of the parameter measured before and immediately after the four-week IMPT. For each outcome, linear regression models were used to estimate the raw and adjusted (sex, age and BMI) effect of additional PNE.Results:Despite improvement in all outcomes for both groups during the treatment phase, the implemented PNE did not result in additional pain reduction (regression coefficient for PNE effect on pain level 0.34; 95% CI -6.23-6.97). Between-group differences could only be shown for pain-related knowledge in favor for the intervention group (0.78; 95% CI 0.35-1.20).Conclusion:The additional PNE lecture did not lead to pain reduction beyond the usual IMPT. However, the PNE did increase pain-related knowledge and, therefore, might be helpful in coping with pain after the IMPT program.? 2020 Richter et al.
机译:目的:跨学科多峰疼痛治疗(IMPT)慢性背痛的程序是有效的,推荐的。 IMPT的患者以患者为中心的和生物学性质性质地基于当代理解,慢性疼痛状态反映了神经系统的敏感性,而不是组织中的问题。教学患者关于疼痛是IMPT计划的一部分,但缺乏临床指南。本研究旨在回答以下问题:对患者进行循证止痛神经科学教育(PNE)讲座,进入IMPT计划,比IMPT计划本身产生卓越的结果吗?患者和方法:非随机化,对受控干预研究进行了179名背痛患者,表明IMPT。干预组(N = 102)收到了一项为期四周的IMPT计划,其中包含4个单小时的PNE。对照组(n = 77)在没有额外PNE的情况下接收相同的IMPT。干预后的主要结果是目前疼痛。痛苦知识,身体功能,抑郁,焦虑,压力,生活质量和恐惧避免被分析为二次结果。结果被定义为在4周内测量的参数的变化。对于每个结果,线性回归模型用于估计额外PNE的原始和调整(性别,年龄和BMI)的效果:尽管在治疗阶段,但两组的所有结果都有改善,但实施的PNE没有导致额外的减少疼痛(PNE对疼痛水平的回归系数0.34; 95%CI -6.23-6.97)。群之间的差异只能显示有利于干预组的疼痛相关知识(0.78; 95%CI 0.35-1.20)。结论:额外的PNE讲座不会导致疼痛减少超过通常的IMPT。然而,PNE确实增加了与疼痛有关的知识,因此可能会有所帮助地在IMPT计划后应对疼痛。 2020 Richter等人。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号