首页> 外文OA文献 >Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Predict the Mechanical Properties of Polyamide 2200 (PA12) in Additive Manufacturing
【2h】

Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Predict the Mechanical Properties of Polyamide 2200 (PA12) in Additive Manufacturing

机译:机器学习技术在添加剂制造中预测聚酰胺2200(PA12)的力学性能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Additive manufacturing (AM) is an attractive technology for the manufacturing industry due to flexibility in its design and functionality, but inconsistency in quality is one of the major limitations preventing utilizing this technology for the production of end-use parts. The prediction of mechanical properties can be one of the possible ways to improve the repeatability of results. The part placement, part orientation, and STL model properties (number of mesh triangles, surface, and volume) are used to predict tensile modulus, nominal stress, and elongation at break for polyamide 2200 (also known as PA12). An EOS P395 polymer powder bed fusion system was used to fabricate 217 specimens in two identical builds (434 specimens in total). Prediction is performed for XYZ, XZY, ZYX, and Angle orientations separately, and all orientations together. The different non-linear models based on machine learning methods have higher prediction accuracy compared with linear regression models. Linear regression models only have prediction accuracy higher than 80% for Tensile Modulus and Elongation at break in Angle orientation. Since orientation-based modeling has low prediction accuracy due to a small number of data points and lack of information about the material properties, these models need to be improved in the future based on additional experimental work.
机译:添加剂制造(AM)是制造业的有吸引力的技术因其设计和功能的灵活性,但质量不一致是防止利用该技术的主要限制,以利用该技术生产最终用品。机械性能的预测可以是提高结果可重复性的可能方法之一。部件放置,部分取向和STL模型属性(网格三角形,表面和体积)用于预测聚酰胺2200(也称为PA12)的断裂的拉伸模量,标称应力和伸长率。 EOS P395聚合物粉床融合系统用于制造两种相同的构建中的217个标本(总共434个标本)。对XYZ,XZY,ZYX和角度取向分别进行预测,以及所有取向在一起。与线性回归模型相比,基于机器学习方法的不同非线性模型具有更高的预测精度。线性回归模型仅具有高于80%的预测精度,对于拉伸模量,角度取向的断裂伸长率为80%。由于基于方向的建模具有低预测精度,由于少量的数据点和关于材料特性的信息缺乏信息,因此基于附加实验工作,将来需要在将来改进这些模型。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ivanna Baturynska;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2019
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号