首页> 外文OA文献 >Rocky intertidal temperature variability along the southeast coast of Australia: comparing data from in situ loggers, satellite-derived SST and terrestrial weather stations
【2h】

Rocky intertidal temperature variability along the southeast coast of Australia: comparing data from in situ loggers, satellite-derived SST and terrestrial weather stations

机译:沿澳大利亚东南海岸的岩石跨境温度变异:与型号逻辑,卫星衍生SST和地面气象站的数据进行比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Predicting how both spatial and temporal variation in sea and air temperature influence the distribution of intertidal organisms is a pressing issue. We used data from satellites, weather stations and in situ loggers to test the hypothesis that satellite-derived sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and weather station air temperatures provide accurate estimates of ambient temperature variability on rocky intertidal shores for temporal (hourly for 1 yr) and spatial (10 m to 400 km) variation along the southeast coast of Australia. We also tested whether satellites and weather stations accurately detect the duration, frequency and number of extreme temperature events. Daily mean satellite SSTs and weather station air temperatures were significantly and strongly correlated with intertidal water and air temperatures, respectively (water: r2 = 0.62, air: r2 = 0.63). Nevertheless, depending on location, daily satellite SSTs were up to 6.7°C, and on average 1°C, higher than in situ water temperatures, while daily maximum air temperatures measured by weather stations were up to 23.2°C, and on average 4.2°C, lower than in situ air temperatures. At all locations, the frequency, duration and number of days greater than 30°C, as well as rates of temperature change, were all significantly lower when measured by weather stations. These differences suggest that satellite SSTs and weather stations are ineffective at capturing extremes in intertidal water and air temperature variability. We reinforce the argument that in situ measurements that focus on biologically relevant variation are the only legitimate means of predicting the effects of temperature change on intertidal taxa. © Inter-Research 2011.
机译:预测在海上和空中温度的空间和时间的变化如何影响生物潮间带的分布是一个迫切的问题。我们使用来自卫星,气象站和原位记录器的数据,以测试的假设卫星衍生的海表面温度(的SST)和气象站空气的温度(1年每小时)提供关于用于时间岩相潮间海岸环境温度变化的精确估计和沿着澳大利亚东南海岸空间(10米至400公里)的变化。我们还测试了是否卫星和气象站准确地检测极端温度事件的持续时间,频率和数目。每日平均卫星的SST和气象站空气温度分别显著和强烈潮间带的水和空气的温度,分别为(:R 2 = 0.62,空气:R 2 = 0.63水)相关。然而,取决于位置,每日卫星的SST分别达到6.7℃,和平均1℃,比原位更高的水的温度,同时通过气象站测量的每日最大空气温度分别高达23.2℃,平均4.2 ℃,低于在原位空气温度。在所有位置中,频率,持续时间和天数大于30°C的数量,以及温度变化率,分别为当由气象站测量的所有显著降低。这些差异表明该卫星的SST和气象站是在潮间水和空气的温度的变化捕捉极端无效的。我们加强论点,在现场测量,专注于生物相关的变化都预测在潮间带的类群温度变化的影响的唯一合法途径。 ©际研究2011。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号