首页> 外文OA文献 >Difference of horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios of observed earthquakes and microtremors and its application to S-wave velocity inversion based on the diffuse field concept
【2h】

Difference of horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios of observed earthquakes and microtremors and its application to S-wave velocity inversion based on the diffuse field concept

机译:基于漫射场概念的S波速度反转的横垂直光谱比的差异及其在S波速度反转的差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract We have been discussing the validity of using the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios (HVRs) as a substitute for S-wave amplifications after Nakamura first proposed the idea in 1989. So far a formula for HVRs had not been derived that fully utilized their physical characteristics until a recent proposal based on the diffuse field concept. There is another source of confusion that comes from the mixed use of HVRs from earthquake and microtremors, although their wave fields are hardly the same. In this study, we compared HVRs from observed microtremors (MHVR) and those from observed earthquake motions (EHVR) at one hundred K-NET and KiK-net stations. We found that MHVR and EHVR share similarities, especially until their first peak frequency, but have significant differences in the higher frequency range. This is because microtremors mainly consist of surface waves so that peaks associated with higher modes would not be prominent, while seismic motions mainly consist of upwardly propagating plain body waves so that higher mode resonances can be seen in high frequency. We defined here the spectral amplitude ratio between them as EMR and calculated their average. We categorize all the sites into five bins by their fundamental peak frequencies in MHVR. Once we obtained EMRs for five categories, we back-calculated EHVRs from MHVRs, which we call pseudo-EHVRs (pEHVR). We found that pEHVR is much closer to EHVR than MHVR. Then we use our inversion code to invert the one-dimensional S-wave velocity structures from EHVRs based on the diffuse field concept. We also applied the same code to pEHVRs and MHVRs for comparison. We found that pEHVRs yield velocity structures much closer to those by EHVRs than those by MHVRs. This is natural since what we have done up to here is circular except for the average operation in EMRs. Finally, we showed independent examples of data not used in the EMR calculation, where better ground structures were successfully identified from pEHVRs again. Thus we proposed here a simple empirical method to estimate S-wave velocity structures using single-station microtremor records, which is the most cost-effective method to characterize the site effects.
机译:摘要我们一直在讨论使用水平到垂直光谱比(HVRS)作为替代Nakamura在Nakamura首次提出的思想中的替代方案的有效性。到目前为止,HVRS的公式尚未得到充分利用的他们的物理特征,直到最近基于漫反射现场概念的提议。虽然它们的波浪场几乎不能相同,但还有另一个困惑的源自来自地震和微调的HVRS。在本研究中,我们将HVRS与观察到的微反射器(MHVR)的HVR进行了比较了一百k-net和kik网站的观测地震运动(Ehvr)的HVR。我们发现MHVR和EHVR份额相似,特别是直到它们的第一个峰值频率,但在较高频率范围内具有显着差异。这是因为MicroRemors主要由表面波组成,使得与更高模式相关的峰不会突出,而地震运动主要由向上传播的平纹体波组成,以便在高频中可以看到更高的模式共振。我们在这里定义了它们之间的频谱幅度比作为EMR并计算它们的平均值。我们通过MHVR中的基本峰值频率将所有网站分为五个箱子。一旦我们获得了五个类别的EMR,我们就会从MHVRS返回计算EHVRS,我们调用伪ehvrs(PEHVR)。我们发现PEHVR比MHVR更接近EHVR。然后,我们使用我们的反转码根据漫射场概念反转来自EHVR的一维S波速度结构。我们还将相同的代码应用于PEHVRS和MHVRS进行比较。我们发现PEHVRS产生的速度结构与EHVRS的速度结构更接近于MHVRS的速度结构。这是自然的,因为我们在这里所做的是循环,除了EMRS中的平均操作。最后,我们展示了在EMR计算中未使用的数据的独立示例,其中再次从PEHVRS成功识别出更好的地面结构。因此,我们提出了一种简单的经验方法,可以使用单站微反线记录来估计S波速度结构,这是表征现场效果的最具成本效益的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号