首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of the combustion characteristics and kinetic study of coal, municipal solid waste, and refuse‐derived fuel: Model‐fitting methods
【2h】

Comparison of the combustion characteristics and kinetic study of coal, municipal solid waste, and refuse‐derived fuel: Model‐fitting methods

机译:煤炭,市政固体废物和垃圾燃料燃烧特性和动力学研究的比较:拟合方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Energy crisis and solid waste management have remained challenging issues for authorities in Pakistan. These issues tend to rise with increasing population and economic growth of the society. Therefore, environmentally sustainable waste‐to‐energy program must be part of the waste management system since they may substitute fossil fuels with renewable energy sources by enabling energy recovery instead of landfill of solid wastes. In this work, the combustion characteristics of fossil fuel (coal) and solid wastes such as municipal solid waste (MSW) and refuse‐derived fuel (RDF) were investigated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) to compare their thermal decomposition behavior. Furthermore, proximate and ultimate analyses of these samples were carried out along with their heating values. The TGA profiles of samples indicate low reactivity of coal, whereas solid wastes present greater reaction rate reflecting their low ash and high volatile contents. It was found that the heating value of RDF sample was close to that of coal. The obtained thermal data were used to calculate the kinetic parameters using Arrhenius and Coats‐Redfern models with different reaction mechanisms. According to these models, the fuels could be arranged in order of activation energy as coal > RDF > MSW. The percentage difference between activation energy values found from Arrhenius and Coats‐Redfern models was in the range of 4.1%‐26.5%. However, the Coats‐Redfern model exhibited consistency in activation energy values, followed by a high value of R2. These results of the TGA could be very helpful to predict the combustion dynamics and confirm that MSW and RDF may be used as sustainable fuels, to meet the prevailing challenges of the energy crisis and solid waste management.
机译:摘要能源危机和固体废物管理在巴基斯坦当局仍然挑战问题。这些问题往往会随着社会的人口和经济增长而增加。因此,环境可持续的废物到能量计划必须是废物管理系统的一部分,因为它们可以通过使能量恢复而不是固体废物的垃圾填埋场来替代具有可再生能源的化石燃料。在这项工作中,通过热量分析(TGA)研究了化石燃料(煤)和固体废物如城市固体废物(MSW)和拒绝衍生的燃料(RDF),以比较其热分解行为。此外,与它们的加热值一起进行这些样品的近似和最终分析。样品的TGA谱表明煤的低反应性,而固体废物具有更大的反应速率,反射其低灰分和高挥发性含量。发现RDF样品的加热值接近煤的加热值。所获得的热数据用于使用具有不同反应机制的Arrhenius和涂层 - Refern模型来计算动力学参数。根据这些模型,燃料可以按照煤炭> RDF> MSW的激活能量顺序排列。从Arrhenius和Coats-Redern模型中发现的激活能量值之间的百分比差异在4.1%-26.5%的范围内。然而,涂层 - 铁丝模型在激活能量值中表现出一致性,其次是R2的高值。 TGA的这些结果对于预测燃烧动力学并确认MSW和RDF可以用作可持续燃料,以满足能源危机和固体废物管理的普遍挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号