首页> 外文OA文献 >Developing and Testing the Feasibility of a Culturally Based Tele-Palliative Care Consult Based on the Cultural Values and Preferences of Southern, Rural African American and White Community Members: A Program by and for the Community
【2h】

Developing and Testing the Feasibility of a Culturally Based Tele-Palliative Care Consult Based on the Cultural Values and Preferences of Southern, Rural African American and White Community Members: A Program by and for the Community

机译:基于文化价值观和南方,农村非裔美国人和白色社区成员的文化价值和偏好,开发和测试文化基于远程姑息治疗咨询的可行性:社区和社区的计划

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose: Lack of appreciation of cultural differences may compromise care for seriously ill minority patients, yet culturally appropriate models of palliative care (PC) are not currently available in the United States. Rural patients with life-limiting illness are at high risk of not receiving PC. Developing a PC model that considers the cultural preferences of rural African Americans (AAs) and White (W) citizens is crucial. The goal of this study was to develop and determine the feasibility of implementing a culturally based PC tele-consult program for rural Southern AA and W elders with serious illness and their families, and assess its acceptability to patients, their family members, and clinicians.Methods: This was a three-phase study conducted in rural Beaufort, South Carolina, from January 2013 to February 2016. We used Community-Based Participatory Research methods, including a Community Advisory Group (CAG) with equal numbers of AA and W members, to guide the study. Phase 1: Cultural values and preferences were determined through ethnic-based focus groups comprising family members (15 W and 16 AA) who had cared for a loved one who died within the past year. We conducted a thematic analysis of focus group transcripts, focused on cultural values and preferences, which was used as the basis for the study protocol. Phase 2: Protocol Development: We created a protocol team of eight CAG members, two researchers, two hospital staff members, and a PC physician. The PC physician explained the standard clinical guidelines for conducting PC consults, and CAG members proposed culturally appropriate programmatic recommendations for their ethnic group for each theme. All recommendations were incorporated into an ethnic-group specific protocol. Phase 3: The culturally based PC protocol was implemented by the PC physician via telehealth in the local hospital. We enrolled patients age ?65 with a life-limiting illness who had a family caregiver referred by a hospitalist to receive the PC consult. To assess feasibility of program delivery, including its acceptability to patients, caregivers, and hospital staff, using Donebedian's Structure-Process-Outcome model, we measured patient/caregiver satisfaction with the culturally based consult by using an adaptation of FAMCARE-2.Results: Phase 1: Themes between W and AA were (1) equivalent: for example, disrespectful treatment of patients and family by hospital physicians; (2) similar but with variation: for example, although religion and church were important to both groups, and pastors in both ethnic groups helped family face the reality of end of life, AA considered the church unreservedly central to every aspect of life; (3) divergent, for example, AAs strongly believed that hope and miracles were always a possibility and that God was the decider, a theme not present in the W group. Phase 2: We incorporated ethnic group-specific recommendations for the culturally based PC consult into the standard PC consult. Phase 3: We tested feasibility and acceptability of the ethnically specific PC consult on 18 of 32 eligible patients. The telehealth system worked well. PC MD implementation fidelity was 98%. Most patients were non-verbal and could not rate satisfaction with consu however, caregivers were satisfied or very satisfied. Hospital leadership supported program implementation, but hospitalists only referred 18 out of 28 eligible patients.Conclusions: The first culturally based PC consult program in the United States was developed in partnership with AA and W Southern rural community members. This program was feasible to implement in a small rural hospital but low referral by hospitalists was the major obstacle. Program effectiveness is currently being tested in a randomized clinical trial in three southern, rural states in partnership with hospitalists. This method can serve as a model that can be replicated and adapted to other settings and with other ethnic groups.
机译:目的:缺乏文化差异的升值可能会妥协为严重的少数患者的护理,但在美国目前没有文化适当的姑息治疗(PC)模型。益处利疾病的农村患者处于未接收PC的高风险。开发考虑农村非洲裔美国人(AAS)和白色(W)公民的文化偏好的PC模型至关重要。本研究的目标是制定和确定为农村南部AA和具有严重疾病及其家庭的长老执行文化的PC Tele-Comment计划的可行性,并评估其对患者,家庭成员和临床医生的可接受性。方法:这是在博福特农村进行了三相研究,南卡罗来纳州,从2013年1月至2016年二月,我们使用基于社区的参与研究方法,包括社区咨询小组(CAG)与AA的数量相等和W的成员,指导研究。第1阶段:通过包括家庭成员(15 W和16 AA)的基于种族的焦点小组确定了文化价值和偏好,该组织(15 W和16 AA)被关心了一个在过去一年内死亡的人。我们对焦点组成绩单进行了主题分析,重点是文化价值观和偏好,被用作研究方案的基础。第2阶段:协议开发:我们创建了一个八个CAG成员,两位研究人员,两名医院工作人员和PC医师的协议团队。 PC医师解释了进行PC咨询的标准临床指南,CAG成员提出了对每个主题的民族群体的文化适当的计划建议。所有建议均纳入民族专题议定书。第3阶段:PC医师通过当地医院的电信医生实施了文化基础的PC协议。我们注册了患者年龄?65患者有一个寿命危险的疾病,他们有一个家庭护理人,由医院接受PC咨询。为了评估方案交付的可行性,包括使用Doneedian的结构过程 - 结果模型的患者,护理人员和医院工作人员的可接受性,我们通过使用对FAMCARE-2的改编来测量患者/护理人员满意度与文化的咨询:第1阶段:W和AA之间的主题是(1)等同物:例如,不尊重医院医生患者和家庭的治疗; (2)相似但有变异:例如,虽然宗教和教会对两个团体都很重要,但两个族群的牧师帮助家族面临着生命结束的现实,AA被认为是教会毫无保留地朝着生命的各个方面的核心; (3)例如,AAS强烈认为,希望和奇迹始终是一种可能性,而上帝是决策者,这是W集团中不存在的主题。第2阶段:我们将种族群体的特定建议纳入文化的PC咨询到标准PC咨询。第3阶段:我们测试了在32名合格患者中的18名符合条件的PC的可行性和可接受性。远程医疗系统工作得很好。 PC MD实施保真度为98%。大多数患者是非言语,不能征求满意度;但是,照顾者满意或非常满意。医院领导支持方案实施,但医学家只引用了28名符合条件的患者中的18名。结论:与AA和W南方农村社区成员合作开发了美国第一个文化基础的PC咨询计划。该计划在一个小型农村医院实施,但医院的转诊是最大的障碍。目前在三个南部的随机临床试验中进行了计划效果,与医院合作。此方法可以用作可以复制和适应其他环境和其他种族群体的模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号