首页> 外文OA文献 >Between the Managerial and the Democratic University: Governance Structure and Academic Freedom as Sites of Political Struggle
【2h】

Between the Managerial and the Democratic University: Governance Structure and Academic Freedom as Sites of Political Struggle

机译:在管理和民主大学之间:治理结构和学术自由作为政治斗争的网站

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this article we argue that the university cannot fully contribute to democratic life without being both an institution whose governance is collegial and based on principles of equality, equity, inclusion, transparency, and accountability, and a vector of critical thinking closely linked to academic freedom. Based on this understanding of the ‘democratic university,’ we seek to highlight some of the key tensions between the ‘managerial university’ and the democratic university, as reflected in institutional structures, regulations, legal frameworks, and principles. In order to achieve this objective, we identify two sites of political struggles from which it is possible to examine the interaction between a managerial and a democratic conception and practice of the university. The first of these sites is the bicameral governing structure, membership, rules, and regulations of the University of Ottawa. The second site is academic freedom in Canada, which we will discuss by comparing the Canadian Association of University Teachers’ (CAUT) Statement on Academic Freedom (CAUT, 2011) with the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada’s (AUCC) Statement on Academic Freedom (AUCC, 2011). By stressing the necessary link and positive relationship between democratic governance and academic freedom, the article offers a normative evaluation of the impact the managerial reengineering of Canadian universities has had on the possibility and practice of a more democratic university.
机译:在这篇文章中,我们认为该大学不能完全促进民主生活,而不是一个机构,该机构都是大学的,基于平等,公平,包容,透明度和问责制的原则以及与学术自由密切相关的批判性思维的传染媒介。基于这样的认识“民主大学”,我们力求突出一些“管理大学”和民主大学之间的关键紧张,反映在体制结构,法规,法律框架和原则。为了实现这一目标,我们确定了两个政治斗争的地点,可以研究管理层和大学的民主理念与实践之间的互动。这些网站中的第一个是渥太华大学的双伐治制品,会员,规则和法规。第二个网站是在加拿大,我们将通过对比大学教师的加拿大协会(CAUT)关于学术自由(CAUT,2011)声明与大学和加拿大(AUCC)的学院协会讨论学术自由,学术自由的声明(AUCC,2011)。通过强调民主治理与学术自由之间必要的联系和积极关系,文章提供了对加拿大大学的管理再造的影响的规范评价,这是一个更加民主大学的可能性和实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号