首页> 外文OA文献 >Remote Sensing of Leaf Area Index from LiDAR Height Percentile Metrics and Comparison with MODIS Product in a Selectively Logged Tropical Forest Area in Eastern Amazonia
【2h】

Remote Sensing of Leaf Area Index from LiDAR Height Percentile Metrics and Comparison with MODIS Product in a Selectively Logged Tropical Forest Area in Eastern Amazonia

机译:LIDAR高度百分位度量叶区域指数的遥感与亚马东西部射流热带森林地区的MODIS产品比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Leaf area index (LAI) is an important parameter to describe the capacity of forests to intercept light and thus affects the microclimate and photosynthetic capacity of canopies. In general, tropical forests have a higher leaf area index and it is a challenge to estimate LAI in a forest with a very dense canopy. In this study, it is assumed that the traditional Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)-derived fractional vegetation cover (fCover) has weak relationship with leaf area index in a dense forest. We propose a partial least squares (PLS) regression model using the height percentile metrics derived from airborne LiDAR data to estimate the LAI of a dense forest. Ground inventory and airborne LiDAR data collected in a selectively logged tropical forest area in Eastern Amazonia are used to map LAI from the plot level to the landscape scale. The results indicate that the fCover, derived from the first return or the last return, has no significant correlations with the ground-based LAI. The PLS model evaluated by the leave-one-out validation shows that the estimated LAI is significantly correlated with the ground-based LAI with an R2 of 0.58 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.13. A data comparison indicates that the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) LAI underestimates the landscape-level LAI by about 22%. The MODIS quality control data show that in the selected tile, the cloud state is not the primary factor affecting the MODIS LAI performance; rather, the LAI from the main radiative transfer (RT) algorithm contributes much to the underestimation of the LAI in the tropical forest. In addition, the results show that the LiDAR-based LAI has a better response to the logging activities than the MODIS-based LAI, and that the leaf area reduction caused by logging is about 13%. In contrast, the MODIS-based LAI exhibits no apparent spatial correlation with the LiDAR-based LAI. It is suggested that the main algorithm of MODIS should be improved with regard to tropical forests. The significance of this study is the proposal of a framework to produce ground-based LAI using forest inventory data and determine the plot-level LAI at the airborne and satellite scale using LiDAR data.
机译:叶面积指数(LAI)是描述森林拦截光线的能力,从而影响檐篷的微气候和光合容量。一般来说,热带森林具有更高的叶子区域指数,并且在具有非常茂密的树冠的森林中估算赖斯是一项挑战。在这项研究中,假设传统的光检测和测距(LIDAR)的分数植被覆盖(FCOVER)与致密森林中的叶面积指数薄弱。我们提出了一种利用从机载激光雷达数据衍生的高度百分位数来估计致密森林的赖的百分比度量(PLS)回归模型。在Amazonia东部亚马逊的选择性登录的热带森林地区收集的地面库存和空气传播的LIDAR数据用于将LAI从情节级别映射到景观量表。结果表明,来自第一个返回的FCOVER或上次返回的FCOVER与基于地面的LAI没有显着的相关性。由休假验证评估的PLS模型表明,估计的LAI与基于地面的LAI显着相关,R2为0.58,均线误差(RMSE)为1.13。数据比较表明,适度分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)LAI低估了景观级LAI约22%。 MODIS质量控制数据显示,在所选瓷砖中,云状态不是影响MODIS LAI性能的主要因素;相反,来自主要辐射转移(RT)算法的LAI促进了热带森林中莱的低估了很多。此外,结果表明,基于典和的LIID的LAI对伐木活动的响应更好,而不是基于MODIS的LAI,并且伐木引起的叶面积减少约为13%。相反,基于MODIS的LAI表现出与基于激光雷达的LAI的明显空间相关性。建议应在热带森林方面改善MODIS的主要算法。本研究的重要性是使用森林库存数据生产基于地面赖的框架的框架,并使用LIDAR数据确定空中和卫星秤的情节级赖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号