首页> 外文OA文献 >Urban versus rural lifestyle in adolescents: associations between environment, physical activity levels and sedentary behavior
【2h】

Urban versus rural lifestyle in adolescents: associations between environment, physical activity levels and sedentary behavior

机译:城市与农村生活方式在青少年:环境之间的关联,身体活动水平与久坐行为

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

ABSTRACT Objective To analyze the levels of physical activity and sedentary behavior in adolescents living in urban and rural areas. Methods An epidemiological, cross-section study with quantitative design, carried out at the regional level. The sample comprised 6,234 students aged 14 to 19 years, selected using random cluster sampling. The χ2 test and binary logistic regression were used in the analysis. Results A total of 74.5% of adolescents lived in urban areas. After adjustment, rural residents spent less time watching television (odds ratio – OR: 0.45; 95% confidence interval – 95%CI: 0.39-0.52), using a computer and/or playing video games (OR: 0.30; 95%CI: 0.22-0.42), or sitting down (OR: 0.66; 95%CI: 0.54-0.80); chose passive leisure less often (OR: 0.83; 95%IC: 0.72-0.95) and were less likely to be classified as insufficiently active (OR: 0.88; 95%IC: 0.78-0.99) when compared to urban residents, regardless of sex or age. The fact that adolescents living in rural areas who did not work were more likely to be classified as insufficiently active (OR: 2.59; 95%CI: 2.07-3.24) emphasized the significant role of occupation in physical activity levels in this group. Conclusion Adolescents living in rural areas were less exposed to the sedentary behaviors, chose more active leisure, and had higher levels of physical activity. Place of residence and occupation may play a major role in youth lifestyle.
机译:摘要目的分析居住在城市和农村地区的青少年体育锻炼和久坐行为的水平。方法流行病学,定量设计断面研究,在区域一级进行。样品包含6234级14岁至19岁的学生,采用随机整群抽样。 χ2检验和二元logistic回归分析中使用。结果共青少年的74.5%居住在城市地区。调整后,农村居民的时间较少看电视(比值比 - OR:0.45; 95%置信区间 - 95%CI:0.39-0.52),使用计算机和/或玩视频游戏(OR:0.30; 95%CI: 0.22-0.42),或坐下(OR:0.66; 95%CI:0.54-0.80);选择被动休闲较少(OR:0.83; 95%IC:0.72-0.95)和不太可能被归类为不充分的活性(OR:0.88; 95%IC:0.78-0.99)相比城镇居民时,无论性别或年龄。住在谁没有工作的农村地区的青少年更可能被归类为活性不足的事实(OR:2.59; 95%CI:2.07-3.24)强调体力活动水平这一组中占领显著作用。结论生活在农村地区的青少年被较少地暴露于久坐行为,选择了更积极的休闲,有较高水平的体力活动。居住和职业的地点可能在年轻人生活中起主要作用。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号