首页> 外文OA文献 >Supreme™ laryngeal mask airway insertion requires a lower concentration of sevoflurane than ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway insertion during target-controlled remifentanil infusion: a prospective randomised controlled study
【2h】

Supreme™ laryngeal mask airway insertion requires a lower concentration of sevoflurane than ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway insertion during target-controlled remifentanil infusion: a prospective randomised controlled study

机译:Supreme™喉部面膜气道插入需要较低浓度的七氟烷浓度,而不是Prafeal™喉部掩模气道插入在目标控制的雷芬尼胺输注期间:预期随机对照研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background ProSeal (PLMA) and Supreme (SLMA) laryngeal mask airways are effective ventilator devices with distinctive designs that may require different anaesthetics for insertion. Sevoflurane induction provides acceptable conditions for laryngeal mask insertion, and remifentanil significantly decreases the minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane required for that insertion. The study aimed to evaluate the optimal end-tidal (ET) sevoflurane concentration for successful insertion of PLMA versus SLMA in patients receiving a remifentanil infusion without a neuromuscular blocking agent. Methods Altogether, 45 patients ASA (American Society Anaesthesiologists) physical status I–II, aged 18–60 years were scheduled for elective ambulatory surgery. Exclusion criteria were a difficult airway, recent respiratory infection, reactive airway, obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, gastric aspiration’s risk factors, pregnancy, and lactation. Patients were randomly allocated to receive the SLMA or the PLMA. Sevoflurane induction with co-administration of remifentanil was performed at an effect-site concentration of 4 ng mL− 1. ET50 was calculated with a modified Dixon’s up-and-down method (starting at 2.5% in steps of 0.5%). Predetermined sevoflurane concentration was kept constant during the 10 min before LMA insertion. Patient’s response to LMA insertion was classified as “movement” or “no movement”. Sevoflurane ET50 was determined as the midpoint concentration of all the independent pairs that manifested crossover from “movement” to “no movement”. Results The ET50 sevoflurane concentration co-administered with remifentanil required for PLMA insertion was 1.20 ± 0.41% (95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.63%). For SLMA insertion, it was 0.55 ± 0.38% (95% confidence interval 0.14 to 0.95%) (p = 0.019). Conclusions The end-tidal sevoflurane concentration with co-administered remifentanil required to allow insertion of the SLMA was 54% lower than that needed for inserting the PLMA. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03003377. Retrospectively registered. Date of registration: December 28, 2016.
机译:摘要背景波纹(PLMA)和最高(SLMA)喉部面膜气道是有效的呼吸机装置,具有不同的设计,可能需要不同的麻醉剂来插入。七氟醚诱导为喉掩模插入提供可接受的条件,并且雷芬丹尼显着降低该插入所需的七氟醚的最小肺泡浓度。该研究旨在评估患者在没有神经肌肉阻滞剂的Remifentanil输注的患者中成功插入PLMA与SLMA的最佳末端(ET)七氟脲浓度。方法共有45名患者ASA(美国社会麻醉学家)身体状况I-II,年龄在18-60岁的年龄为60岁的时候进行了选修的动态手术。排除标准是一个困难的气道,最近呼吸道感染,反应性气道,阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征,胃吸中的危险因素,怀孕和哺乳。随机分配患者接收SLMA或PLMA。在4ng ML-1的效果 - 浓度下进行亚氟醚诱导,在4ng -1的效果 - 1.ET50用改性的Dixon的上下方法计算(从0.5%的步骤开始为2.5%)计算。在LMA插入之前,在10分钟内保持预定的七氟脲浓度。患者对LMA插入的反应被归类为“运动”或“无运动”。七氟醚Et50被确定为所有独立对的中点浓度,这些成对的表现为从“运动”到“无运动”的交叉。结果PLMA插入所需的雷芬菊酯共同施用的ET50七氟醚浓度为1.20±0.41%(95%置信区间0.76至1.63%)。对于SLMA插入,其为0.55±0.38%(95%置信区间0.14至0.95%)(P = 0.019)。结论所需的共同施用的雷芬氟醚浓度允许允许允许浆料插入液体的末端氮嘌呤浓度比插入PLMA所需的54%低54%。试验登记ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03003377。回顾性地注册。注册日期:2016年12月28日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号