首页> 外文OA文献 >West Sees East: Cultural Stereotypes in Twentieth-Century Czech Discourse about Indian Religions
【2h】

West Sees East: Cultural Stereotypes in Twentieth-Century Czech Discourse about Indian Religions

机译:西方看到东:二十世纪捷克语话语的文化陈规定型观念关于印度宗教

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The history of the humanities suggests that no scholarly discipline or theory can function without the models and categories it generates and relies on. Since they are necessarily conditioned by the cultural and ideological context in which they are developed, however, they readily become distorting stereotypes. During its academic history, the academic study of religions has been formed by philosophical perspectives and worldviews drawn from Evolutionism, Positivism, Historicism, Scientific Atheism, Theology, and other schools of thinking. This article explores this use of stereotypes through the example of shifting perceptions of a different culture in the history of Czech understandings of Indian religions during the 20th century, on the basis of a critical analysis of Czech discourse about Indian religions in several academic disciplines: theology, philosophy, history, study of religions, sociology, etc. We see that the religions of India were repeatedly evaluated through stereotypes and a European colonial mindset of cultural values, such as the Western search for doctrinal order in the ‘Oriental chaos’, an emphasis on Western ‘activity’ as opposed to perceived Oriental ‘passivity’, or seeing Catholic hierarchy reflected in the Indian caste system. These stereotypes were also deeply entrenched in Czech popular understandings of Indian culture, despite the low levels of contact between Czech and Indian society. Both in academic and in popularized discourse, we can recognize the uncritical and mechanical adoption of models, categories and values from a Western European cultural framework rather than as a result of scholars’ empirical experience and scholarly evidence. Keywords: Czech Study of Religions, Indian Religions and Culture, Orientalism, Stereotypes
机译:人文科学的历史表明,没有学术纪律或理论可以在没有它产生和依赖的模型和类别的情况下运作。由于它们必须由他们开发的文化和思想语境条件,因此它们易于变得扭曲的刻板印象。在学术历史中,宗教的学术研究由哲学观点和世界观从进化论,实证主义,历史主义,科学无神论,神学和其他思维所学校所吸引。本文通过在20世纪捷克语宗教历史上对印度宗教历史历史的思考的例子来探讨了这种陈规定型观念,在几个学科关于印度宗教的捷克语宗教的批判性分析:神学,哲学,历史,宗教,社会学等研究。我们看到印度的宗教反复通过刻板印象和欧洲殖民地思想的文化价值观评估,例如西方搜索“东方混乱”中的教义命令,强调西方的“活动”而不是感知东方'被动',或看到印度种姓制度体现的天主教等级。尽管捷克和印度社会之间的联系水平低,但这些刻板印象也深深地侵入了印度文化的普遍理解。无论是在学术和大众化的话语中,我们都可以认识到西欧文化框架的模型,分类和价值观的不共同批判和机械,而不是学者的实证经验和学术证据。关键词:捷克语研究宗教,印度宗教和文化,东方主义,刻板印象

著录项

  • 作者

    Tomáš Bubík;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号