首页> 外文OA文献 >Identifying Three-Dimensional Facial Fluctuating Asymmetry in Normal Pediatric Individuals: A Panel Assessment Outcome Study of Clinicians and Observers
【2h】

Identifying Three-Dimensional Facial Fluctuating Asymmetry in Normal Pediatric Individuals: A Panel Assessment Outcome Study of Clinicians and Observers

机译:鉴定正常儿科个人的三维面部波动不对称性:临床医生和观察员的面板评估结果研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study measured three-dimensional facial fluctuating asymmetry in 600 normal and healthy Taiwanese individuals (6 to 12 years old) and assessed the perceptions of increasing levels of facial fluctuating asymmetric severity by using a panel composed of 20 clinicians (surgical professionals), as well as 20 adult and 40 pre-adolescent observers. On average, this normal cohort presented a facial fluctuating asymmetry of 0.96 ± 0.52 mm, with 0.52 ± 0.05, 0.67 ± 0.09, 1.01 ± 0.10, and 1.71 ± 0.36 mm for levels I, II, III, and IV of severity, respectively. For all categories of raters, significant differences in the average symmetry−asymmetry scale values were observed, with level I < level II < level III = level IV (all p < 0.01, except for level III vs. IV comparisons with p > 0.05). For level I, pre-adolescent observers presented a significantly (p < 0.05) higher symmetry−asymmetry scale value than adult observers, with no significant (all p > 0.05) differences for other comparisons. For overall facial asymmetry and levels II, III, and IV, no significant (all p > 0.05) differences were observed. This study reveals that the normal pediatric face is asymmetric and the panel assessment of facial fluctuating asymmetry was influenced by the level of severity and the category of raters and contributes to the literature by revealing that pre-adolescent raters present a similar or higher perception of facial asymmetry than adult raters.
机译:本研究在600个正常和健康的台湾个体(6至12岁)测量的三维面部波动不对称,并通过使用20个临床医生(外科专业人员)由面板评估面部波动不对称严重性水平的不断提高的感知,以及为20名成人和40青春期前的观察员。平均而言,这种正常的队列,II,III,和严重程度的IV分别0.67±0.09,1.01±0.10,和1.71±0.36毫米的水平我提出的0.96±0.52毫米的面部波动不对称,与0.52±0.05。对于评价者的所有类别,观察到的平均对称的不对称比例值显著差异,I级<级别II <级别III = IV级(所有的p <0.01,除了III水平与对与IV的比较> 0.05) 。对于电平I,青春期前的观察者呈现的显著(P <较成人观察员0.05)更高的对称性-不对称度值,没有显著(所有p>有其他比较0.05)差异。对于整体面部不对称和水平II,III,和IV,没有显著(所有P> 0.05),观察到的差异。这项研究表明,正常儿科面是不对称的,并且面部波动不对称的面板评估由揭示青春期前的评估者呈现的面部类似或更高的感知严重性的水平和评价者和有助于文献的类别的影响不对称性比成人评价者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号