首页> 外文OA文献 >A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of the sandwich bone augmentation technique in increasing buccal bone thickness during implant placement. II. Tomographic, histologic, immunohistochemical, and RNA analyses
【2h】

A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of the sandwich bone augmentation technique in increasing buccal bone thickness during implant placement. II. Tomographic, histologic, immunohistochemical, and RNA analyses

机译:一种随机临床试验,评估夹层骨增强技术在植入物放置期间增加颊骨厚度的功效。 II。断层摄影,组织学,免疫组织化学和RNA分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the biologic and structural phenotypes of the bone regenerated via the sandwich bone augmentation (SBA) technique, on buccal implant dehiscence defects.Material and MethodsTwenty‐six patients with one buccal implant dehiscence defect each were randomly assigned to two groups. Both groups received a standardized amount of mineralized cancellous and cortical allogenic bone graft. In the test group, a bovine pericardium membrane was placed over the graft, while no membrane was placed in the control group. After 6 months of healing, a bone core biopsy of the regenerated bone was harvested and processed for histologic, immunohistochemical, mRNA, and micro‐computed tomography (μCT) analyses. Of the 26 bone core biopsies, only six cores from the test group and six cores from the control group were suitable for the analysis.ResultsBone volume (BV) in the test group was maintained, but tissue maturation appeared to be delayed. In contrast, tissue maturation appeared to be completed in the control group, but BV was compromised. Micro‐CT analysis showed that specimens from the control group were more structured and mineralized compared with those from the test group. Histologic analysis showed more residual graft particles scattered in a loose fibrous connective tissue matrix with sparse bone formation in the test group, while the control group showed obvious vital bone formation surrounding the residual graft particles. Positive periostin (POSTN), sclerostin, and runt‐related transcription factor‐2 (RUNX2) immunoreactivities were detected in both the control and test groups. However, tartrate‐resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) positive was mostly noted in the control group. There were significant differences in POSTN, RUNX2 and VEGF expressions between the test and control groups.ConclusionThese findings indicated that the SBA technique was an effective method in preserving adequate structural volume while promoting new vital bone formation. Use of the collagen barrier membrane has successfully maintained the volumetric dimensions of the ridge but might have slowed down the complete maturation of the outermost layer of the grafted site.
机译:ObjectivesThis研究的目的是评价通过夹心骨增强(SBA)技术再生的骨的生物学和结构的表型,上颊植入defects.Material和MethodsTwenty名患者裂开与一个颊植入物裂开缺陷每个被随机分配到两个组。两组接受了标准化量的矿化消泡和皮质同种异体骨移植物。在试验组中,将牛心包膜置于移植物上,同时在对照组中没有膜置于对照组中。在6个月的愈合后,收获再生骨的骨核心活检,并为组织学,免疫组织化学,mRNA和微计算断层扫描(μCT)分析处理。在26个骨核心活组织检查中,来自试验组的六个核心和来自对照组的六个核心适用于分析。维持试验组中的培养体积(BV),但组织成熟似乎延迟。相反,组织成熟似乎在对照组中完成,但BV受到损害。微型CT分析显示,与试验组的那些,来自对照组的标本更具结构化和矿化。组织学分析显示在试验组中具有稀疏骨质结缔组织基质中散射的更多残留的移植物颗粒,而对照组围绕残留接枝颗粒呈现明显的骨形成。在对照组和试验组中检测到阳性骨膜(Postn),硬化素和runt相关转录因子-2(runx2)免疫反应。然而,在对照组中,抗抗酒石酸酸磷酸酶(捕集性)阳性阳性。测试和对照组之间的Postn,Runx2和VEGF表达存在显着差异。结论这些结果表明,SBA技术是一种有效的方法,其在促进新的重要骨形成时保持足够的结构体积。使用胶原屏障膜已经成功地保持了脊的容积尺寸,但可能已经减慢了接枝部位的最外层的完整成熟度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号