首页> 外文OA文献 >Makes FLASH the difference between the intervention group and the treatment-as-usual group in an evaluation study of a structured education and treatment programme for flash glucose monitoring devices in people with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
【2h】

Makes FLASH the difference between the intervention group and the treatment-as-usual group in an evaluation study of a structured education and treatment programme for flash glucose monitoring devices in people with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

机译:在糖尿病密集胰岛素治疗糖尿病患者中闪光葡萄糖监测装置的结构化教育和治疗方案的评估研究中,使干预组和治疗方案之间的差异闪现在糖尿病患者中的评价研究中:随机对照试验的研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background People with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy need sufficient glycaemic control to prevent the onset or progression of diabetic complications. The burden of multiple daily blood glucose self-testing can be lessened by novel diabetes technology like flash glucose monitoring systems which provide more information compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose. Despite this delivered additional information studies are showing no significant effect on HbA1c reduction, but a reduced time spent in a hypoglycaemic glucose range. We assume that users of these devices need additional education and training to integrate the delivered information into treatment decisions. Therefore, FLASH, an education and treatment programme, was developed. The programme evaluation follows herein. Methods/design Patients are recruited through 40 diabetes outpatient study centres located across Germany. They will be randomly assigned to participate in the education and treatment programme (intervention group) or to obtain treatment as usual (control group). All patients have to give blood samples and to answer a bench of questionnaires during baseline assessment, at the end of the intervention, and 6 months after the end of the intervention. Physicians will be asked to declare some additional clinical data (such as details of the diabetes therapy) for every patient at every one of the three assessment points. Discussion This study is conducted as a randomised controlled trial to test the hypothesis that the newly developed education and treatment programme combined with the use of a flash glucose monitoring device (intervention group) is superior to reduce HbA1c compared to the use of flash glucose monitoring alone (control group). The first results will be expected in 2018. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03175315. Registered on 2 May 2017.
机译:摘要背景人与强化胰岛素治疗的糖尿病需要足够的血糖控制,以防止糖尿病并发症的发病或进展。通过新型糖尿病技术,如闪光葡萄糖监测系统,可以减少多种日常血糖自检的负担,其提供更多信息与血糖的自我监测相比。尽管这提供了额外的信息,但表现出对HBA1C的减少没有显着影响,但在低血糖葡萄糖范围内花费的时间降低。我们假设这些设备的用户需要额外的教育和培训,将交付的信息整合到治疗决策中。因此,开发了Flash,教育和治疗计划。在此遵循的程序评估。方法/设计患者通过位于德国的40名糖尿病门诊学习中心招募。它们将被随机分配参与教育和治疗方案(干预组)或以通常(对照组)获得治疗。所有患者必须在基线评估期间在干预结束时提供血样,并在基线评估期间回答问卷的长凳,干预结束后6个月。在三项评估点中每一个患者,医生将被要求宣布一些额外的临床数据(例如糖尿病疗法的细节)。讨论本研究作为随机对照试验进行测试,以测试新开发的教育和治疗方案与使用闪光血糖监测装置(干预组)相结合的假设,与单独的闪光葡萄糖监测相比,使用闪光葡萄糖监测(干预组)优于降低HBA1c (控制组)。第一个结果将在2018年预期。试验登记ClinicalTrials.gov,ID:NCT03175315。 2017年5月2日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号