首页> 外文OA文献 >Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in anti-programmed death-1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 trials of advanced melanoma
【2h】

Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in anti-programmed death-1 and anti-programmed death ligand 1 trials of advanced melanoma

机译:替代终点用于反编程死亡1和反编程死亡配体1先进心素瘤的试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: We assessed the surrogacy of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS) for overall survival (OS) in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 trials of metastatic melanoma through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for phase II/III RCTs till June 2019 investigating anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents. Treatment effect (hazard ratio or odds ratio) on potential surrogates (ORR/DCR/PFS) and OS were collected. At trial level, we assessed the correlation between treatment effect on potential surrogates and OS, weighted by sample size, fixed and random effect models, and calculated the surrogate threshold effect (STE). Sensitivity analyses and leave-one-out cross-validation approach were performed to evaluate the robustness of our findings. Results: We included 8 RCTs (4110 patients; 11 comparisons). We did not identify strong correlations between ORR [coefficient of determination ( R 2 ): 0.09–0.25], DCR (0.41–0.57) and OS. However, we noted a strong correlation between PFS and OS, with R 2 of 0.82 in sample size, 0.75 in fixed effect and 0.72 in random effect model weighting, the robustness of which was further verified by leave-one-out cross-validation approach. Sensitivity analyses with restriction to trials with less than 50% crossover, phase III trials, large trials and first-line trials strengthened the correlation (0.78–0.94). The STE for PFS was 0.78. Conclusions: PFS may be the appropriate surrogate for OS in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 trials of metastatic melanoma. A future anti-PD-1/PD-L1 trial would need less than 0.78 for PFS of the upper limit of confidence interval to predict an OS benefit.
机译:背景:我们评估了通过A转移性黑素瘤的抗PD-1 / PD-L1试验的整体存活率(OS)的客观反应率(ORR),疾病控制率(DCR)和无进展生存(PFS)的替代性。随机对照试验的荟萃分析(RCT)。方法:在2019年6月调查抗PD-1 / PD-L1代理,搜查了PubMed and Embase ins II / III RCTS。收集潜在替代物(ORR / DCR / PFS)和OS上的治疗效果(危害比率或差距)。在试验水平,我们评估了对潜在替代物和OS的治疗效果之间的相关性,由样本大小,固定和随机效果模型加权,并计算出替代阈值效应(STE)。进行敏感性分析和休假交叉验证方法,以评估我们发现的稳健性。结果:我们包括8个RCT(4110名患者; 11个比较)。我们未识别ORR之间的强烈相关性[判定系数(R 2):0.09-0.25],DCR(0.41-0.57)和OS。然而,我们注意到PFS和OS之间的强烈相关,R 2在样品尺寸下0.82,固定效果0.75,随机效果模型加权0.72,其鲁棒性通过休假交叉验证方法进一步验证。敏感性分析与少于50%的交叉,第III期试验,大型试验和一线试验的试验的限制分析加强了相关性(0.78-0.94)。 PFS的STE为0.78。结论:PFS可以是转移性黑色素瘤的抗PD-1 / PD-L1试验中的适当替代物。对于预测OS受益,未来的防PD-1 / PD-L1试验需要小于0.78的PFS以预测OS受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号