首页> 外文OA文献 >A Secure and Anonymous Two-Factor Authentication Protocol in Multiserver Environment
【2h】

A Secure and Anonymous Two-Factor Authentication Protocol in Multiserver Environment

机译:MultiServer环境中的安全和匿名双因素认证协议

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

With the great development of network technology, the multiserver system gets widely used in providing various of services. And the two-factor authentication protocols in multiserver system attract more and more attention. Recently, there are two new schemes for multiserver environment which claimed to be secure against the known attacks. However, after a scrutinization of these two schemes, we found that (1) their description of the adversary’s abilities is inaccurate; (2) their schemes suffer from many attacks. Thus, firstly, we corrected their description on the adversary capacities to introduce a widely accepted adversary model and then summarized fourteen security requirements of multiserver based on the works of pioneer contributors. Secondly, we revealed that one of the two schemes fails to preserve forward secrecy and user anonymity and cannot resist stolen-verifier attack and off-line dictionary attack and so forth and also demonstrated that another scheme fails to preserve forward secrecy and user anonymity and is not secure to insider attack and off-line dictionary attack, and so forth. Finally, we designed an enhanced scheme to overcome these identified weaknesses, proved its security via BAN logic and heuristic analysis, and then compared it with other relevant schemes. The comparison results showed the superiority of our scheme.
机译:随着网络技术的巨大发展,多元体系得到广泛用于提供各种服务。多因素系统中的双因素认证协议吸引了越来越多的关注。最近,有两个用于多模式环境的新方案,用于对已知攻击来保护。然而,在这两种方案的审查后,我们发现(1)他们对逆境的能力的描述是不准确的; (2)他们的计划遭受了许多攻击。因此,首先,我们纠正了对婚姻侵犯的对手的能力的描述,然后基于先锋贡献者的作品总结了多元体的十四安全要求。其次,我们透露,这两种方案中的一个不能保留前锋保密和用户匿名性,并且不能抵抗被盗验证者攻击和离线词典攻击等,并且还证明另一个方案无法保留前进保密和用户匿名和用户匿名。不安全到内幕攻击和离线词典攻击等等。最后,我们设计了一个增强的方案来克服这些所识别的弱点,通过禁令逻辑和启发式分析证明了其安全性,然后将其与其他相关方案进行比较。比较结果表明我们的计划的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号