首页> 外文OA文献 >Surgical Treatment of Lateral Tibial Plateau Fractures Involving the Posterolateral Column
【2h】

Surgical Treatment of Lateral Tibial Plateau Fractures Involving the Posterolateral Column

机译:侧胫高原骨折的外科治疗涉及后柱的裂缝

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective To summarize the indications and the clinical effects of a transfibular neck osteotomy approach and a combined anterolateral and posterolateral approach in the treatment of fractures of the lateral tibial plateau involving the posterolateral column. Methods Eleven patients with lateral tibial plateau fractures were included in the present study. The fractures were Schatzker type II or lateral platform fractures involving posterolateral column. The anterolateral combined posterolateral approach (lateral + posterolateral locking plate fixation) was applied in 7 patients and 4 patients underwent transfibular neck osteotomy (lateral + posterolateral locking plate fixation + 1/4 tubular plate edge fixation, fibular osteotomy with Kirschner wire tension band fixation, and hollow nail fixation for upper tibiofibular joint). All cases were followed up for 12–24 months, with an average follow‐up of 17.5 ± 5.0 months. At the last followup, the Rasmussen radiological criteria were used to evaluate the effect of fracture reduction and fixation. The knee joint function was evaluated using the knee function evaluation criteria of the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS). The Lachman test and the pivot‐shift test were used to evaluate the anterior and posterior and rotational stability of the knee joint. The range of knee motion was recorded. Results Bone healing was achieved in all patients with fractures treated with a transfibular neck osteotomy approach and a combined anterolateral and posterolateral approach. At the last follow‐up, both the Lachman test and the pivot‐shift test results were negative. All patients had complete knee extension. For the combined anterolateral and posterolateral approach, the knee flexion angle was 110°–130°, with an average of 122.86° ± 7.56°. For the transfibular neck osteotomy approach, the knee flexion angle was 115°–130°, with an average of 120.00° ± 7.07°. For the patients in which the combined anterolateral and posterolateral approach was used, the Rasmussen score was 12–18 points, with an average of 16.00 ± 2.56 points. The results were excellent in 4 cases and good in 3 cases; therefore, 100% of results were excellent or good. For patients in which the transfibular neck osteotomy approach was used, the Rasmussen score was 10–18 points, with an average of 15.25 ± 3.77 points. The results were excellent in 2 cases, good in 1 case, and acceptable in 1 case; therefore, 75% of results were excellent or good. The HSS score for the combined anterolateral and posterolateral approach was 76–98 points, with an average of 88.43 ± 7.55 points. The results were excellent in 5 cases and good in 2 cases; therefore, 100% of results were excellent or good. The HSS score for the transfibular neck osteotomy approach was 74–96 points, with an average of 87.25 ± 9.43 points. The results were excellent in 3 cases and good in 1 case; therefore, 100% of results were excellent or good. There were no significant differences in operation time, surgical blood loss, fracture healing time, postoperative imaging score, and knee function evaluation between the two approaches. One patient who underwent transfibular neck osteotomy had a 3‐mm step that gradually appeared, but no significant abnormalities were found in the width of the platform and the lower limb force line. One patient in whom the combined anterolateral and posterolateral approach was used showed numbness in the common peroneal nerve. No common peroneal nerve injury occurred through the transfibular neck osteotomy approach. Conclusions The anterolateral combined posterolateral approach and the transfibular neck osteotomy approach are effective in the surgical treatment of lateral tibial plateau fractures involving the posterolateral column. However, the transfibular neck osteotomy approach is more suitable for the posterolateral plateau articular surface damaged with bone separation and displacement, deep collapse, cases involving a large range of the posterolateral column, especially fractures of the lateral tibial plateau in the upper tibiofibular syndesmosis area of the line connecting the anterior and posterior margin of the fibular head to the midpoint of the plateau.
机译:目的概述了颈部截骨术方法的适应症和临床疗效及其组合前胫骨平台裂缝的组合前和后侧方法。方法本研究包括11例侧胫高原骨折的患者。骨折是施扎尔II型或涉及后侧柱的横向平台骨折。在7名患者中,应用前外侧综合的后聚体方法(外侧+后侧锁定板固定)和4名患者接受了4例患者进行了颈部骨质术(外侧+后+后侧锁定板固定+ 1/4个管状板边缘固定,腓骨骨质术与Kirschner线张力带固定,上部胫骨关节的空心钉固定)。所有病例随访12-24个月,平均随访17.5±5.0个月。在最后的后续后,Rasmussen放射性标准用于评估断裂和固定的效果。使用医院的膝部函数评估标准进行评估膝关节功能,用于特殊手术(HSS)。 Lachman测试和枢轴转换试验用于评估膝关节的前后和旋转稳定性。记录了膝关节运动范围。结果骨愈合患者骨折,骨折骨折骨折骨折术治疗,并组合前外侧和后侧接种。在最后一次随访中,拉克曼测试和枢轴转变测试结果都是负的。所有患者都有完整的膝盖延伸。对于组合的前外侧和后外侧方法,膝关节屈曲角度为110°-130°,平均为122.86°±7.56°。对于颈部骨膜骨切断方法,膝关节屈曲角度为115°-130°,平均为120.00°±7.07°。对于使用组合的前外侧和后外侧方法的患者,Rasmussen得分为12-18分,平均为16.00±2.56点。结果在4例和3例患者中具有优异;因此,100%的结果是优异的或良好的。对于使用的患者使用的患者,Rasmussen得分为10-18分,平均为15.25±3.77点。结果在2例出色,1例良好,1例中可接受;因此,75%的结果是优异的或良好的。联合前运动和后侧方法的HSS评分为76-98点,平均为88.43±7.55点。结果在5例和2例中良好,2例良好;因此,100%的结果是优异的或良好的。分颈截骨术的HSS评分为74-96点,平均为87.25±9.43点。结果在3例中优异,1例良好;因此,100%的结果是优异的或良好的。操作时间没有显着差异,手术失血,骨折愈合时间,术后成像评分和两种方法之间的膝关节函数评估。接受了传递颈部骨质术的一名患者具有3毫米的步骤,逐渐出现,但在平台的宽度和下肢力线的宽度下没有发现显着异常。在使用联合前外侧和后侧方法的一名患者在常见的腓骨神经中显示出麻木。通过传递颈部截骨术方法发生常见的颈神经损伤。结论前外侧综合产物方法和分娩颈部骨质切除方法在涉及后侧柱的外侧胫骨平台骨折外科治疗中是有效的。然而,经颈部骨质切除术方法更适合于骨分离和位移的后侧高原关节表面,深塌陷,涉及大范围的后侧柱,尤其是侧胫骨膜高原骨折的骨折将腓骨前缘和后边缘连接到高原的中点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号