首页> 外文OA文献 >Clinical Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Older Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis
【2h】

Clinical Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Older Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis

机译:较旧的非小细胞肺癌患者免疫检查点抑制剂的临床疗效:META分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment landscape among non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The efficacy of ICI therapy in older patients (≥65 years) is controversial and not fully clarified. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC based on age (<65 years vs. ≥65 years).Methods: A comprehensive literature search for eligible randomized control phase II/III trials that compared the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents against chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients. Pooled overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) estimates were calculated based on random/fixed effects models according to the heterogeneity between the studies.Results: A total of 10 studies involving 8 randomized controlled trials (2 updates) were enrolled in this meta-analysis [2,662 young patients (<65 years) and 1,971 older patients (≥65 years)]. The efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents is comparable between young (<65 years) and older (≥65 years) patients for OS [HR 0.75 95% CI (0.64–0.88) vs. 0.76 95% CI (0.66–0.87)]. However, our pooled analysis was not sufficient to show a significant benefit in terms of PFS for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents [HR 0.87 95% CI (0.74–1.01), P = 0.06]. In addition, we failed to see a PFS superiority of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents against chemotherapy in two age subgroups [<65 years and ≥65 years, HR 0.85 95% CI (0.72–1.01), P = 0.07 and HR 0.87 95% CI (0.68–1.10), P = 0.25].Conclusion: ICIs therapy presents comparable efficacy in older advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with young patients.
机译:背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIS)已经改变之间的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的治疗景观。老年患者ICI疗法(≥65岁)的疗效是有争议的,没有完全阐明。我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析根据年龄来评价的ICI的患者晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌的疗效(<65岁与≥65岁)方法:一个全面的文献检索,对符合条件的随机对照的II期/ III试验相比抗PD-1 / PD-L1对化疗药物在晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌的患者的功效。合并总生存率(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的估计是基于随机/固定效应模型根据studies.Results之间的异质性计算:共涉及8个随机对照试验(2次更新)的10项研究的入选在此荟萃分析[2662年轻患者(<65岁)和1971名老年患者(≥65岁)。抗PD-1 / PD-L1剂的功效是年轻之间相当(<65岁)和老年(≥65岁)患者对于OS [HR 0.75 95%CI(0.64-0.88)与0.76 95%CI( 0.66-0.87)]。然而,我们的汇总分析不足以显示抗PD-1 / PD-L1剂PFS方面具有显著益处[HR 0.87 95%CI(0.74-1.01),P = 0.06]。此外,我们没有看到抗PD-1 / PD-L1对化学治疗剂在两个年龄亚组[<65岁和≥65岁,HR 0.85 95%CI(0.72-1.01)的PFS优越性,P = 0.07和HR 0.87 95%CI(0.68-1.10),P = 0.25]。结论:ICI不变治疗呈现相当的功效在年龄较大的晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌患者与年轻患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号