首页> 外文OA文献 >Validation of brightness and physical temperature from two scanningmicrowave radiometers in the 60 GHz O2 band using radiosonde measurements
【2h】

Validation of brightness and physical temperature from two scanningmicrowave radiometers in the 60 GHz O2 band using radiosonde measurements

机译:通过两次扫描验证亮度和物理温度使用探空仪测量的60 GHz O2波段的微波辐射计

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this paper, we address the assessment of the tropospheric performance of anew temperature radiometer (TEMPERA) at 60 GHz. With this goal, anintercomparison campaign was carried out at the aerological station ofMeteoSwiss in Payerne (Switzerland). The brightness temperature and thetropospheric temperature were assessed by means of a comparison withsimultaneous and collocated radiosondes that are launched twice a day atthis station. In addition, the TEMPERA performances are compared with theones from a commercial microwave radiometer (HATPRO), which has some differentinstrumental characteristics and uses a different inversion algorithm.Brightness temperatures from both radiometers were compared with the onessimulated using a radiative transfer model and atmospheric profiles fromradiosondes. A total of 532 cases were analyzed under all weather conditionsand evidenced larger brightness temperature deviations between the tworadiometers and the radiosondes for the most transparent channels.Two different retrievals for the TEMPERA radiometer were implemented in orderto evaluate the effect of the different channels on the temperatureretrievals. The comparison with radiosondes evidenced better results verysimilar to the ones from HATPRO, when the eight more opaque channels were used.The study shows the good performance of TEMPERA to retrieve temperatureprofiles in the troposphere. The inversion method of TEMPERA is based on theoptimal estimation method. The main advantage of this algorithm is that there is no necessity forradiosonde information to achieve good results in contrast to conventionalmethods as neural networks or lineal regression. Finally, an assessment of the effect of instrumental characteristics as thefilter response and the antenna pattern on the brightness temperature showedthat they can have an important impact on the most transparent channels.
机译:在本文中,我们讨论了在60 GHz下对新型温度辐射仪(TEMPERA)对流层性能的评估。为了达到这个目标,在瑞士佩耶恩的MeteoSwiss气象站进行了一次比对活动。通过与每天两次发射的同步并置无线电探空仪进行比较,评估了亮度温度和对流层温度。此外,将TEMPERA性能与商用微波辐射仪(HATPRO)的性能进行了比较,后者具有不同的仪器特性并使用了不同的反演算法,并将两种辐射仪的亮度温度与使用辐射传输模型和放射性探空仪模拟的大气温度进行了比较。 。在所有天气条件下对总计532例案例进行了分析,结果表明最透明通道的两个辐射仪和无线电探空仪之间的亮度温度偏差较大。对TEMPERA辐射仪进行了两次不同的检索,以评估不同通道对温度检索的影响。与无线电探空仪的比较表明,当使用另外八个不透明通道时,与HATPRO的结果非常相似。研究表明,TEMPERA在对流层中检索温度剖面的良好性能。 TEMPERA的反演方法基于最优估计方法。该算法的主要优点是,与传统方法(如神经网络或线性回归)相比,探空仪信息无需获得良好的结果。最后,评估仪器特性(如滤波器响应和天线方向图)对亮度温度的影响表明,它们可以对最透明的通道产生重要影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号