首页> 外文OA文献 >Long-term MAX-DOAS network observations of NO2 in Russia and Asia (MADRAS) during the period 2007ndash;2012: instrumentation, elucidation of climatology, and comparisons with OMI satellite observations and global model simulations
【2h】

Long-term MAX-DOAS network observations of NO2 in Russia and Asia (MADRAS) during the period 2007ndash;2012: instrumentation, elucidation of climatology, and comparisons with OMI satellite observations and global model simulations

机译:2007年至2012年俄罗斯和亚洲(MADRAS)对NO2的MAX-DOAS长期网络观测:仪器,气候学阐明以及与OMI卫星观测和全球模式模拟的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We conducted long-term network observations using standardized Multi-AxisDifferential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) instruments in Russiaand ASia (MADRAS) from 2007 onwards and made the first synthetic dataanalysis. At seven locations (Cape Hedo, Fukue and Yokosuka in Japan, Hefeiin China, Gwangju in Korea, and Tomsk and Zvenigorod in Russia) withdifferent levels of pollution, we obtained 80 927 retrievals of troposphericNO vertical column density (TropoNO2VCD) and aerosol optical depth(AOD). In the technique, the optimal estimation of the TropoNO2VCD and itsprofile was performed using aerosol information derived from Oabsorbances simultaneously observed at 460–490 nm. This large data set wasused to analyze NO climatology systematically, including temporalvariations from the seasonal to the diurnal scale. The results were comparedwith Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) satellite observations and globalmodel simulations. Two NO retrievals of OMI satellite data (NASA ver.2.1 and Dutch OMI NO (DOMINO) ver. 2.0) generally showed closecorrelations with those derived from MAX-DOAS observations, but had lowbiases of up to ~50%. The bias was distinct when NO wasabundantly present near the surface and when the AOD was high, suggesting apossibility of incomplete accounting of NO near the surface underrelatively high aerosol conditions for the satellite observations. Except forconstant biases, the satellite observations showed nearly perfect seasonalagreement with MAX-DOAS observations, suggesting that the analysis ofseasonal features of the satellite data were robust. Weekend reduction in theTropoNO2VCD found at Yokosuka and Gwangju was absent at Hefei, implying thatthe major sources had different weekly variation patterns. While theTropoNO2VCD generally decreased during the midday hours, itincreased exceptionally at urban/suburban locations (Yokosuka, Gwangju, andHefei) during winter. A global chemical transport model, MIROC-ESM-CHEM(Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate–Earth SystemModel–Chemistry), was validated for the first time with respect tobackground NO column densities during summer at Cape Hedo and Fukue inthe clean marine atmosphere.
机译:从2007年起,我们在俄罗斯和亚洲使用标准的多轴差分光吸收光谱(MAX-DOAS)仪器(MADRAS)进行了长期网络观测,并进行了首次合成数据分析。在污染程度不同的七个地点(日本的开普敦,福江和横须贺,中国的合肥,韩国的光州,俄罗斯的托木斯克和兹韦尼哥罗德),我们获得了80927个对流层NO垂直柱密度(TropoNO2VCD)和气溶胶光学深度的回收量( AOD)。在这项技术中,TropoNO2VCD及其剖面的最佳估计是利用同时在460-490 nm处观察到的吸光度得出的气溶胶信息进行的。该大型数据集用于系统地分析NO气候,包括从季节尺度到昼夜尺度的时间变化。将结果与臭氧监测仪(OMI)卫星观测和全球模型模拟进行了比较。 OMI卫星数据的两次NO取回(NASA 2.1版和荷兰OMI NO(DOMINO)2.0版)通常显示与MAX-DOAS观测值密切相关,但低偏差高达〜50%。当NO大量存在于地表附近和AOD较高时,偏见是明显的,这表明在卫星观测相对较高的气溶胶条件下,地表附近的NO不能完全解释的可能性。除恒定偏差外,卫星观测值与MAX-DOAS观测值显示出近乎完美的季节一致性,这表明对卫星数据的季节特征的分析是可靠的。合肥市没有在横须贺和光州发现的TropoNO2VCD周末减少,这表明主要来源的每周变化模式不同。虽然TropoNO2VCD通常在中午时段减少,但冬季时在市区/郊区(横须贺,光州和合肥)异常增加。针对夏季清洁海角和福江海角的背景NO柱密度,首次验证了全球化学品运输模型MIROC-ESM-CHEM(气候-地球系统模型-化学跨学科研究模型)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号