首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study for Linezolid and Two Novel Antibacterial Oxazolidinone Derivatives in Rabbits: Can Differences in the Pharmacokinetic Properties Explain the Discrepancies between Their In Vivo and In Vitro Antibacterial Activities?
【2h】

Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study for Linezolid and Two Novel Antibacterial Oxazolidinone Derivatives in Rabbits: Can Differences in the Pharmacokinetic Properties Explain the Discrepancies between Their In Vivo and In Vitro Antibacterial Activities?

机译:LINAILID的比较药代动力学研究及两种新型抗菌恶唑烷酮衍生物在兔子中:可以在药代动力学性质中差异解释其体内和体外抗菌活性之间的差异?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This is a comparative pharmacokinetics study of linezolid (Lzd), and two novel oxazolidinone antibacterial agents—PH027 and PH051—in rabbits to determine if the discrepancy between the in vitro and in vivo activities of the novel compounds is due to pharmacokinetic factors. The pharmacokinetics after IV and oral administration, plasma protein binding and tissue distribution for the three compounds were compared. The elimination half-lives were 52.4 ± 6.3, 68.7 ± 12.1 and 175 ± 46.1 min for Lzd, PH027 and PH051, respectively. The oral bioavailability for Lzd, PH027 and PH051 administered as suspension were 38.7%, 22.1% and 4.73%, which increased significantly when administered as microemulsion to 51.7%, 72.9% and 13.9%. The plasma protein binding were 32–34%, 37–38% and 90–91% for Lzd, PH027 and PH051. The tissue distribution for PH027 and PH051 in all investigated tissues were higher than that for Lzd. It can be concluded that the lower bioavailability of PH027 and PH051 compared to Lzd when administered as suspension is the main cause of their lower in vivo activity, despite their comparable in vitro activity. Differences in the other pharmacokinetic characteristics cannot explain the lower in vivo activity. The in vivo activity of the novel compounds should be re-evaluated using formulations with good oral bioavailability.
机译:这是Linezolid(LZD)的比较药代动力学研究,以及两种新的恶唑烷酮抗菌剂-PH027和pH051-兔,以确定在体外和新化合物的体内活性之间的差异是由于药代动力学因素。比较了IV和口服给药后的药代动力学,比较了三种化合物的血浆蛋白结合和组织分布。对于LZD,PH027和PH051,消除半衰期为52.4±6.3,68.7±12.1和175±46.1分钟。当悬浮液中施用的LZD,PH027和PH051的口腔生物利用度为38.7%,22.1%和4.73%,当微乳液中施用至51.7%,72.9%和13.9%时显着增加。血浆蛋白结合为LZD,PH027和PH051的32-34%,37-38%和90-91%。所有研究组织中pH027和pH051的组织分布高于LZD。可以得出结论,尽管它们在体外活性可比,但悬浮时,与LZD相比,PH027和PH051的生物利用度降低了与LZD相比的主要原因。其他药代动力学特征的差异不能解决体内活动的较低。使用具有良好口服生物利用度的制剂再评估新化合物的体内活性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号