首页> 外文OA文献 >A survey of CT doses in Saudi Arabian and Australian paediatric hospitals and the variation in radiographers’ knowledge about and attitudes towards CT
【2h】

A survey of CT doses in Saudi Arabian and Australian paediatric hospitals and the variation in radiographers’ knowledge about and attitudes towards CT

机译:沙特阿拉伯和澳大利亚儿科医院的CT剂量调查以及放射线技师对CT的了解和态度的变化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The use of computed tomography (CT) has increased rapidly since the 1970s. CT is a high-dose imaging modality and poses relatively high stochastic and deterministic risks to patients. Paediatric patients are at particular risk due to their smaller body size and the higher radiation sensitivity of their developing organs. Radiographers can play an important role in the reduction of CT radiation dose in paediatric patients, but the literature suggests that radiographers lack understanding of CT radiation dose, and that protocols are rarely modified and updated for children. This study explores and describes Australian and Saudi Arabian paediatric CT radiographers’ knowledge about and attitudes towards CT radiation dose and intervention, and determines the impact of their knowledge and attitudes on protocol selection for paediatric CT scans. The project had three components: a paediatric CT radiographer survey; dosimetry measurements at hospitals; and in-depth interviews with radiographers. The survey findings indicate that Australian paediatric CT radiographers engage in more dose intervention activity than their Saudi Arabian counterparts, receive more initial training, have greater work experience and more continuing professional development (CPD). The knowledge and attitudes of radiographers toward CT dose do not strongly influence their knowledge and practice of CT imaging. Saudi Arabian radiographers were sceptical about the necessity of their CT referrals, unlike Australian radiographers. Both Australian and Saudi Arabian respondents mistakenly believed that the abdomen/pelvis region typically received higher CT doses than the head or chest regions. Dosimetry indicated that CT doses, using the CT departments’ 3-6-year-old protocols, varied considerably between hospitals (head doses – 137.6-528.0 mGy.cm, chest doses – 21.9-92.5 mGy.cm, abdomen/pelvis doses – 24.9-118.0 mGy.cm). Mean head and abdomen/pelvis doses delivered in Saudi Arabian paediatric CT departments are significantly higher than in their Australian equivalents. In Australian paediatric CT departments quality assurance (QA) and machine servicing was performed regularly, whereas most Saudi interviewees reported that no QA was performed. Most Australian interviewees claimed that protocols were modified or updated from machine manufacturers’ defaults, but most Saudi respondents followed the manufacturers’ protocols. Dose intervention is practised in both Australian and Saudi Arabian CT departments, but formal policies are uncommon. Australian radiographers perceived chest and abdomen/pelvis doses as significantly lower (mean 25.7 mGycm and 35.2 mGycm) than actual doses (mean 51.1 mGycm and 68.0 mGycm). There were no significant differences between Saudi Arabians’ perceived and actual doses. Radiographers’ knowledge and understanding of CT dose affect protocols and vary between Australian and Saudi Arabian paediatric hospitals. Australian and Saudi Arabian radiographers have strongly positive attitudes to dose reduction, uninhibited by their lack of knowledge. Australian paediatric CT radiographers have better levels of formal education and more frequent CPD, reflected in their greater willingness to modify CT protocols and alter them for individual cases. However, Australian radiographers suffer from the same misconceptions about paediatric CT dose as less-educated Saudi radiographers, reflecting their poor exposure to paediatric-specific CT within their formal training and CPD. Radiographers should be encouraged and financially supported in CPD and should modify and update CT protocols regularly. Efforts should be directed at improving the knowledge base of radiographers to minimise radiation exposure among paediatric patients. To standardise and reduce dose for paediatric patients, diagnostic reference levels should be established for major anatomical regions that undergo CT.
机译:自1970年代以来,计算机断层扫描(CT)的使用迅速增加。 CT是一种大剂量成像方式,对患者构成相对较高的随机性和确定性风险。小儿患者的体型较小,并且其发育器官对放射线的敏感性较高,因此特别危险。放射线照相师可以在降低儿科患者的CT放射线剂量方面发挥重要作用,但是文献表明,放射线照相师对CT放射线剂量缺乏了解,并且很少对儿童进行修改和更新。这项研究探索并描述了澳大利亚和沙特阿拉伯的儿科CT放射照相师。有关CT辐射剂量和干预措施的知识和态度,并确定他们的知识和态度对儿科CT扫描方案选择的影响。该项目包括三个部分:儿科CT射线照相术调查;医院的剂量学测量;以及对射线照相师的深入采访。调查结果表明,澳大利亚的儿科CT射线照相师比沙特阿拉伯的射线照相师从事更多的剂量干预活动,接受了更多的初步培训,拥有更丰富的工作经验和更加持续的专业发展(CPD)。放射线医师对CT剂量的知识和态度不会强烈影响他们对CT成像的知识和实践。与澳大利亚的放射线技师不同,沙特阿拉伯的放射线技师对他们的CT转诊的必要性表示怀疑。澳大利亚和沙特阿拉伯的受访者都错误地认为,腹部/骨盆区域通常比头部或胸部区域接受更高的CT剂量。剂量测定表明使用CT部门的CT剂量。 3-6岁的方案在各医院之间存在很大差异(头部剂量-137.6-528.0 mGy.cm,胸部剂量-21.9-92.5 mG​​y.cm,腹部/骨盆剂量-24.9-118.0 mGy.cm)。沙特阿拉伯儿科CT部门的平均头和腹部/骨盆剂量明显高于澳大利亚的同等剂量。在澳大利亚的儿科CT部门中,定期进行质量保证(QA)和机器维修,而大多数沙特阿拉伯受访者报告没有进行质量检查。大多数澳大利亚受访者声称协议是由机器制造商修改或更新的。违约,但大多数沙特阿拉伯受访者都遵循制造商的意见协议。澳大利亚和沙特阿拉伯的CT部门都实行剂量干预,但是正式的政策并不常见。澳大利亚放射线医师认为胸部和腹部/骨盆的剂量(平均25.7 mGycm和35.2 mGycm)明显低于实际剂量(平均51.1 mGycm和68.0 mGycm)。沙特阿拉伯之间没有显着差异。感知和实际剂量。射线照相师对CT剂量的了解和理解会影响方案,并且在澳大利亚和沙特阿拉伯的儿科医院之间会有所不同。澳大利亚和沙特阿拉伯的放射线照相师对减少剂量具有强烈的积极态度,但他们并不缺乏知识。澳大利亚儿科CT放射线照相师的正规教育水平更高,CPD频率更高,这体现在他们更愿意修改CT方案并针对个别病例进行更改。但是,澳大利亚放射线医师与受教育程度较低的沙特放射线医师一样,对儿科CT剂量存在同样的误解,这反映出他们在正规培训和CPD中很少接触到儿科特定的CT。 CPD应鼓励放射技师并为其提供财政支持,并应定期修改和更新CT协议。应努力改善放射线照相人员的知识基础,以最大程度地减少小儿患者的放射线暴露。为了标准化和减少儿科患者的剂量,应为接受CT扫描的主要解剖区域建立诊断参考水平。

著录项

  • 作者

    Almohiy H;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号