Programmes for the Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration (DDR) of ex-combatants have become a standard tool in peacebuilding. Empirical data on their effectiveness suggest varying degrees of success. The need for a more holistic, integrated approach has long been recognised, but rarely achieved. The reintegration of ex-combatants takes place in the community, and merges with development and post-conflict reconstruction. This study uses the concept of “participation” from development discourse, to look at reintegration in Sierra Leone and Liberia. A participatory approach allows potential stakeholders to have a say in how interventions are conceived and implemented. Participation is largely unexplored in the context of DDR. The study looks at the extent to which the programmes were participatory. It also seeks to identify the constraints and enabling factors in taking a participatory approach, and the impact on stakeholders. It is based on focus group discussions and surveys of ex-combatants, and semi-structured interviews with a range of stakeholders.ududIt finds that participation and ownership are only seen to a limited extent. Many ex-combatants felt they did not receive adequate or accurate information, that they had been misled, and that programmes did not meet their expectations. Opportunities to have a say in the process were limited. Women in particular were more likely to be excluded. More participatory processes were however noted in specific areas, such as the programmes for children.ududConstraints included short timescales for implementation, security concerns, differing agendas, and post-war disruption. Participation proves to be a useful framework for assessing reintegration programmes, and for planning the more integrated approach which has long been advocated. More participatory approaches were also linked with better programme outcomes for ex-combatants, in terms of employment, relations with the community, and living conditions. They are also seen as helping to rebuild social capital, which is itself a contributory factor in terms of how participatory reintegration can support the broader objectives of peacebuilding. This wider agenda of peacebuilding, which is ultimately what DDR is supposed to be part of, is supported by a participatory approach to reintegration, and undermined by one in which there is little ownership by those directly involved.ud
展开▼
机译:前战斗人员的解除武装,复员和重返社会方案已成为建设和平的标准工具。关于其有效性的经验数据表明成功的程度不同。长期以来,人们就认识到需要一种更全面,集成的方法,但很少能实现。前战斗人员的重返社会在社区内进行,并与发展和冲突后重建合并。这项研究使用发展话语中的“参与”概念,考察塞拉利昂和利比里亚的重返社会。参与式方法使潜在的利益相关者可以就如何设计和实施干预措施发表意见。在DDR的背景下,参与程度尚待进一步探讨。这项研究着眼于计划的参与程度。它还试图确定采取参与性方法的制约因素和促成因素,以及对利益相关者的影响。它基于焦点小组讨论和对前战斗人员的调查,以及对一系列利益相关者的半结构化访谈。 ud ud发现参与和所有权只有有限的范围。许多前战斗人员感到他们没有得到足够或准确的信息,被误导了,方案没有达到他们的期望。在此过程中发表意见的机会有限。特别是女性更可能被排除在外。但是,在特定领域(例如针对儿童的计划)中也注意到了更多的参与性过程。 ud ud约束包括实施时间短,安全问题,议程不同以及战后破坏。事实证明,参与是评估重返社会方案和规划长期以来一直倡导的更加综合的方法的有用框架。在就业,与社区的关系和生活条件方面,更多的参与性方法还与前战斗人员的更好方案成果联系在一起。它们还被视为有助于重建社会资本,就参与性重返社会如何能够支持建设和平的更广泛目标而言,社会资本本身就是一个促成因素。这种更广泛的建设和平议程,最终应该是复员方案的一部分,得到了重返社会的参与性方法的支持,但受到直接参与者几乎没有所有权的方案的破坏。
展开▼