首页> 外文OA文献 >Autonomy as lived: an empirical-ethical analysis of patient autonomy in the clinical context of individuals engaged with self-testing technology
【2h】

Autonomy as lived: an empirical-ethical analysis of patient autonomy in the clinical context of individuals engaged with self-testing technology

机译:自主性:对参与自我测试技术的个人的临床环境中患者自主权的经验 - 伦理分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Aim/Background: This study examines the meaning of patient autonomy in healthcare in the clinical context of individuals engaged with self-testing technology. Patient autonomy has gained increased prominence in healthcare ethics, policy and practice in recent decades. This poses challenges when autonomy competes with other moral principles. The proliferation of self-testing technology provides a contextualised example of this ideological shift. The philosophical assumption underpinning these technologies is that they facilitate greater autonomy through self-management. This study explores that assumption and the wider reverence to autonomy in healthcare.ududMethodology: Heideggerian phenomenology provides an overarching philosophy for the research. The study adopts an empirical ethics research design, which integrates philosophical analysis and empirical enquiry in a cyclical fashion. Ethical analysis precedes and follows empirical investigation. Interpretive phenomenology is utilised to elicit the lived experience of autonomy among 12 individuals with diabetes engaged in the self-testing process. The perspectives of prominent stakeholders such as healthcare professionals and scientific community members are also sought. Data is analysed collectively in accordance with a hermeneutic approach.ududFindings/Recommendations: The study illuminates the ethical principle of autonomy in a practical context. Findings reveal an understanding of Autonomy as lived: The interdependent phenomenon of autonomy in self-testing whereby the patient experience of autonomy is underpinned by three inter-reliant relationships - Relationship with device, Relationship with illness and Relationship with healthcare provider. Findings suggest that autonomy is a contextualised, relational process, which exists as a continuum and occurs within constraints. The concept of ‘negotiated autonomy’ is suggested as a means to operationalise Autonomy as lived within the patient/healthcare professional relationship. Findings have implications for bioethicists, policy-makers, healthcare professionals and patients when conceptualising and operationalising autonomy. The study also highlights the benefit of dialogue among the scientific community regarding the social and ethical dimensions of emerging technologies.
机译:目的/背景:本研究探讨了从事自我测试技术的个人在临床背景下患者自主权在医疗保健中的意义。近几十年来,患者自主权在医疗保健道德,政策和实践中日益受到重视。当自主权与其他道德原则竞争时,这就构成了挑战。自我测试技术的激增提供了这种意识形态转变的情境化实例。这些技术的基础哲学假设是,它们通过自我管理促进了更大的自主权。这项研究探索了这一假设以及对医疗保健自主权的更广泛的尊重。 ud ud方法论:海德格尔现象学为该研究提供了总体哲学。该研究采用了经验伦理研究设计,该研究设计以周期性的方式整合了哲学分析和实证研究。道德分析在实证研究之前和之后。解释性现象学被用于激发12位参与自我测试过程的糖尿病患者的自主经验。还寻求医疗保健专业人员和科学社区成员等重要利益相关者的观点。根据解释学方法对数据进行集体分析。 ud ud发现/建议:本研究阐明了在实际情况下自治的伦理原则。研究结果揭示了人们对自治的理解:自我测试中相互依存的自主现象,即患者的自主经验受到三个相互依存关系的支撑:与设备的关系,与疾病的关系以及与医疗提供者的关系。研究结果表明,自治是一个上下文关系化的过程,它作为一个连续体存在,并在约束内发生。建议使用“协商自主权”的概念,以实现患者/医疗保健专业关系中存在的自主权。当对自主权进行概念化和实施时,研究结果对生物伦理​​学家,政策制定者,医疗保健专业人员和患者产生影响。该研究还强调了科学界之间就新兴技术的社会和道德层面进行对话的好处。

著录项

  • 作者

    Greaney Anna-Marie;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号