首页> 外文OA文献 >The Comprehensive Business Income Tax System: A Proposal for Ultimate Neutrality between Debt and New Equity Issues?
【2h】

The Comprehensive Business Income Tax System: A Proposal for Ultimate Neutrality between Debt and New Equity Issues?

机译:综合业务所得税制度:债务与新股权问题之间的最终中立建议?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The majority of experts agree that taxes are distortionary in nature. This is relatively true for all of the different groups of taxes, but for the corporate taxes is exceptionally obvious. The existence of corporate taxes can affect the company’s behavior in a number of ways and one of them is the distortion of choice of the sources of finance. As it is known, companies usually face 2 different financial alternatives to cover their investment opportunities: debt and equity (new equity issues or alternatively, retained earnings). According to the principles of corporate taxation, since interest payments are in fact tax deductible from the corporate income tax base, the debt source of finance is commonly considered as tax preferred as compared to the equity source of finance. Similarly, retained earnings are more preferred to new equities since capital gains are usually taxed upon realization or eventually exempted from taxation when reinvested. The theory suggests many varieties of corporate tax systems that sustain relative capacities to offset the excessive burden on the external equity supported investments and thus, eliminate the debt-equity related distortions.From the wider literature offer, we chose to examine the comprehensive business income tax system (CBIT), a proposal of the US Treasury Department and compare it with the basic “classical” approach in corporate taxation. The intention is to explore its properties from the view of neutrality and the allocation criteria, for which purpose the basic methodology of EMTR is additionally modified and extended. We hope to prove that this corporate system has justified its reputation in the sphere of our interest.
机译:大多数专家都认为税收本质上是扭曲性的。对于所有不同的税种,这都是相对正确的,但对于公司税,则是非常明显的。公司税的存在可以通过多种方式影响公司的行为,其中之一就是对财务来源选择的扭曲。众所周知,公司通常会面临两种不同的财务选择来覆盖其投资机会:债务和股权(发行新股本或留存收益)。根据公司税收原则,由于利息支付实际上可以从公司所得税税基中扣除,因此,与股票资金来源相比,债务的财务来源通常被认为是税收的首选。同样,保留收益比新股票更受青睐,因为资本收益通常在变现时征税,或在再投资时最终免征税。该理论表明,许多公司税制可以维持相对的能力,以抵消由外部股权支持的投资带来的过度负担,从而消除与债务权益相关的扭曲。从更广泛的文献资料中,我们选择考察全面的企业所得税系统(CBIT),是美国财政部的一项提案,并将其与公司税收中的基本“经典”方法进行了比较。目的是从中立性和分配标准的角度探讨其属性,为此,对EMTR的基本方法进行了额外的修改和扩展。我们希望证明这一公司制度已经证明了其在我们关注的领域中的声誉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号