首页> 外文OA文献 >A critical comparison between English marine insurance warranty and Chinese marine insurance warranty:a case for reform
【2h】

A critical comparison between English marine insurance warranty and Chinese marine insurance warranty:a case for reform

机译:英国海上保险保证与中国海上保险保修的重要比较:改革案例

摘要

As a special contractual term, warranties in marine insurance policy are crucial for risk assessment purpose. Warranty in marine insurance law has survived for centuries. Despite its long period of existence, the current warranty regime has been criticised by a number of scholars and the Law Commission. The main criticism is that it operates unfairly against the assured.Due to the existing problem of the current warranty regime, the main aim of this research is to critically analyse the law of warranty in the English Marine Insurance Act 1906. Where necessary, some law reform proposals will be introduced into the Marine Insurance Act 1906. Moreover, a critical comparison between the law of warranty in the Chinese Maritime Code 1993 and the law of warranty in the Marine Insurance Act 1906 will be made. Due to the simple provisions of Article 235 of the Maritime Code which deals with the issue of warranty, some new law proposals will be introduced into this Article for clarification purpose.In order to achieve these merits, this thesis concentrates on the critical examination as to the law of warranty under the relevant provisions of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 and the Maritime Code 1993. Some law reform proposals made by other scholars will be critically analysed. In particular, the historical development of English and Chinese marine insurance will be provided in Chapter 1 and 3 respectively. The research on the issue of warranty consists of 4 Chapters, namely Chapter 2, Chapter 4, Chapter 5 and Chapter 6. Chapter 2 provides the nature of warranty under section 33 and 34 of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 and some relevant law reform proposals. Chapter 4 consists of the discussion as to the statutory rules of warranty under Article 235 of the Maritime Code. Chapter 5 specifies the statutory rules for the creation of express warranty. Chapter 6 deals with the critical review as to the different types of implied warranty in section 39 and 41 of the Marine Insurance Act 1906, and the author will also introduce some new statutory rules as to the implied warranties to replace the present law. Additionally, as there is no implied warranty under the Maritime Code, in this Chapter, the statutory rules as to implied warranties will be introduced and inserted into the Maritime Code. Finally, Chapter 7 provides the general conclusion of this thesis for the law of warranty in England and China.
机译:作为特殊的合同条款,海上保险保单对于风险评估至关重要。海洋保险法的保证已经存在了多个世纪。尽管存在很长一段时间,但当前的保修制度遭到了许多学者和法律委员会的批评。主要批评是它对被保险人不公平地运作。由于当前担保制度存在问题,本研究的主要目的是对英国1906年《海洋保险法》中的担保法进行批判性分析。改革建议将引入《 1906年海上保险法》。此外,还将对《 1993年中国海商法》中的担保法与《 1906年海上保险法》中的担保法进行严格的比较。由于《海事法》第235条中涉及保修问题的简单规定,本条中将引入一些新的法律提案以进行澄清。为了实现这些优点,本论文着重于对根据1906年《海上保险法》和1993年《海事法》的有关规定,对担保法进行了审查。将对其他学者提出的一些法律改革建议进行严格的分析。特别是,第1章和第3章将分别介绍中英文海上保险的历史发展。关于担保问题的研究包括4章,即第2章,第4章,第5章和第6章。第2章提供了《 1906年海上保险法》第33和34条以及一些相关法律改革提案所规定的担保性质。第四章讨论了《海商法》第235条中关于保修的法定规则。第5章指定了创建明示保证的法定规则。第六章讨论了《 1906年海上保险法》第39和41节中关于不同类型的隐含担保的严格审查,并且作者还将针对隐含担保取代现行法律引入一些新的法定规则。此外,由于《海事规则》没有默示担保,因此在本章中,将引入有关默示担保的法定规则,并将其插入《海事规则》中。最后,第七章为英格兰和中国的保修法提供了本文的一般结论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Li Wei Bin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 21:55:31

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号