首页> 外文OA文献 >Prevalence of liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica) in wild Red Deer (Cervus elaphus): coproantigen ELISA is a practicable alternative to faecal egg counting for surveillance in remote populations
【2h】

Prevalence of liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica) in wild Red Deer (Cervus elaphus): coproantigen ELISA is a practicable alternative to faecal egg counting for surveillance in remote populations

机译:野生红鹿(Cervus elaphus)肝吸虫(Fasciola hepatica)的流行:coproantigen ELIsa是一种切实可行的替代粪便卵计数用于远程人群的监测

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Red deer (Cervus elaphus) are hosts of liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica); yet, prevalence is rarely quantified in wild populations. Testing fresh samples from remote regions by faecal examination (FE) can be logistically challenging; hence, we appraise frozen storage and the use of a coproantigen ELISA (cELISA) for F. hepatica surveillance. We also present cELISA surveillance data for red deer from the Highlands of Scotland. Diagnoses in faecal samples (207 frozen, 146 fresh) were compared using a cELISA and by FE. For each storage method (frozen or fresh), agreement between the two diagnostics was estimated at individual and population levels, where population prevalence was stratified into cohorts (e.g., by sampling location). To approximate sensitivity and specificity, 65 post-slaughter whole liver examinations were used as a reference. At the individual level, FE and cELISA diagnoses agreed moderately (κfrozen = 0.46; κfresh = 0.51), a likely reflection of their underlying principles. At the population level, FE and cELISA cohort prevalence correlated strongly (Pearson’s R = 0.89, p 0.0001), reflecting good agreement on relative differences between cohort prevalence. In frozen samples, prevalence by cELISA exceeded FE overall (42.8% vs. 25.8%) and in 9/12 cohorts, alluding to differences in sensitivity; though, in fresh samples, no significant difference was found. In 959 deer tested by cELISA across the Scottish Highlands, infection prevalence ranged from 9.6% to 53% by sampling location. We highlight two key advantages of cELISA over FE: i) the ability to store samples long term (frozen) without apparent loss in diagnostic power; and ii) reduced labour and the ability to process large batches. Further evaluation of cELISA sensitivity in red deer, where a range of fluke burdens can be obtained, is desirable. In the interim, the cELISA is a practicable diagnostic for F. hepatica surveillance in red deer, and its application here has revealed considerable geographic, temporal, sex and age related differences in F. hepatica prevalence in wild Scottish Highland red deer.
机译:马鹿(鹿)是肝吸虫(Fasciola hepatica)的寄主。然而,在野生种群中很少量化流行率。通过粪便检查(FE)测试来自偏远地区的新鲜样品可能在逻辑上具有挑战性;因此,我们评估了冷冻保存和辅助抗原原ELISA(cELISA)在肝炎链球菌监测中的应用。我们还提供了来自苏格兰高地的红鹿的cELISA监测数据。粪便样品(207冷冻,146新鲜)的诊断使用cELISA和FE进行比较。对于每种存储方法(冷冻或新鲜),在个体和人群水平上估计了两种诊断方法之间的一致性,在这些水平上将人群患病率分为不同的队列(例如,通过抽样地点)。为了评估敏感性和特异性,我们将65个屠宰后全肝检查作为参考。在个体水平上,FE和cELISA诊断的结果中等(κ冷冻= 0.46;κ新鲜= 0.51),可能反映了其基本原理。在人群水平上,FE和cELISA队列患病率密切相关(Pearson R = 0.89,p <0.0001),反映了队列患病率之间相对差异的良好一致性。在冷冻样品中,cELISA的患病率总体上超过了FE(42.8%对25.8%),在9/12个队列中,这表明敏感性不同。但是,在新鲜样品中,没有发现显着差异。在959年通过cELISA在苏格兰高地进行测试的鹿中,按采样点的感染率从9.6%到53%不等。我们着重介绍了cELISA相对于FE的两个主要优点:i)能够长期(冻结)存储样品而不会明显降低诊断能力; ii)减少劳动量和处理大批量产品的能力。需要进一步评估马鹿中的cELISA敏感性,从而获得一系列的fl幸负担。在此期间,cELISA是一种实用的诊断方法,可用于对马鹿肝炎链球菌进行监测,在这里的应用表明,苏格兰高地野生马鹿肝炎链球菌患病率存在​​明显的地理,时间,性别和年龄相关差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号