首页> 外文OA文献 >The impact of routine open nonsuction drainage on fluid accumulation after thyroid surgery: a prospective randomised clinical trial.
【2h】

The impact of routine open nonsuction drainage on fluid accumulation after thyroid surgery: a prospective randomised clinical trial.

机译:常规开放性非抽吸引流对甲状腺手术后积液的影响:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Thyroid drains following thyroid surgery are routinely used despite minimal supportive evidence. Our aim in this study is to determine the impact of routine open drainage of the thyroid bed postoperatively on ultrasound-determined fluid accumulation at 24 hours. Methods: We conducted a prospective randomised clinical trial on patients undergoing thyroid surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to a drain group (n = 49) or a no-drain group (n = 44) immediately prior to wound closure. Patients underwent a neck ultrasound on day 1 and day 2 postoperatively. After surgery, we evaluated visual analogue scale pain scores, postoperative analgesic requirements, self-reported scar satisfaction at 6 weeks and complications. Results: There was significantly less mean fluid accumulated in the drain group on both day 1, 16.4 versus 25.1 ml (P-value = 0.005), and day 2, 18.4 versus 25.7 ml (P-value = 0.026), following surgery. We found no significant differences between the groups with regard to length of stay, scar satisfaction, visual analogue scale pain score and analgesic requirements. There were four versus one wound infections in the drain versus no-drain groups. This finding was not statistically significant (P = 0.154). No life-threatening bleeds occurred in either group. Conclusions: Fluid accumulation after thyroid surgery was significantly lessened by drainage. However, this study did not show any clinical benefit associated with this finding in the non-emergent setting. Drains themselves showed a trend indicating that they may augment infection rates. The results of this study suggest that the frequency of acute life-threatening bleeds remains extremely low following abandoning drains. We advocate abandoning routine use of thyroid drains. Trial registration: ISRCTN94715414.
机译:背景:尽管支持证据很少,但仍常规使用甲状腺手术后的甲状腺引流管。我们在这项研究中的目的是确定术后24小时甲状腺常规开放引流对超声测定的液体积聚的影响。方法:我们对接受甲状腺手术的患者进行了一项前瞻性随机临床试验。在伤口闭合之前,将患者随机分为引流组(n = 49)或不引流组(n = 44)。术后第一天和第二天对患者进行颈部超声检查。手术后,我们评估了视觉模拟评分疼痛评分,术后镇痛要求,6周自我报告的疤痕满意度和并发症。结果:术后第1天,引流组的平均积液量明显减少,分别为16.4和25.1 ml(P值= 0.005),以及第2天,18.4和25.7 ml(P值= 0.026)。我们发现两组之间在住院时间,疤痕满意度,视觉模拟评分疼痛评分和镇痛要求方面无显着差异。引流组与不引流组分别有4例感染感染与1例伤口感染。该发现在统计学上不显着(P = 0.154)。两组均未发生危及生命的出血。结论:甲状腺引流术后的积液明显减少。但是,该研究未显示在非紧急情况下与该发现相关的任何临床益处。排水渠本身显示出趋势,表明它们可能会增加感染率。这项研究的结果表明,放弃排泄物后,危及生命的急性出血的发生率仍然非常低。我们主张放弃常规使用甲状腺引流管。试用注册:ISRCTN94715414。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号