首页> 外文OA文献 >Sedimentation in a rock-walled inlet, Lyttelton Harbour, New Zealand
【2h】

Sedimentation in a rock-walled inlet, Lyttelton Harbour, New Zealand

机译:新西兰Lyttelton Harbour岩壁入口的沉积

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The principal concern of this study is the examination of sedimentation and sedimentary processes in a rock-walled tidal inlet, Lyttelton Harbour. The harbour is distinctive from other forms of inlets commonly discussed in the literature due primarily to a negligible freshwater input, lateral grain size contours which are parallel to current flow paths, and a maintenance, channel dredging programme which greatly exceeds the natural harbour sedimentation rates. A further unusual characteristic of the harbour is the lateral limitation imposed on processes within the harbour by the surrounding rigid, rock boundaries. These boundaries influence and control circulation patterns within the harbour through the interaction between processes and geometry. Thus Lyttelton Harbour is a structurally controlled tidal inlet. The only harbour boundary which is free to respond to changes in the system is the bed. For these reasons traditional inlet concepts, applicable to estuaries and inlets with unconsolidated boundaries, were found to be unsatisfactory for explaining how Lyttelton Harbour operates. The study approach involves fieldwork and analysis of both sedimentary and hydraulic processes within the harbour. A bed sediment survey showed that the harbour can be divided along its longitudinal axis with very fine mud sediments on the northern side, and coarser, sandier sediments on the southern side. All bed sediments are predominantly fine, and a survey of near-bed suspended sediment concentrations revealed fluid mud layers on the northern side of the harbour, at the harbour entrance, and within the channel. The primary hydraulic processes operating are tidal currents, although a mixed wave field, comprising ocean swell and locally generated wind waves, frequently penetrates the harbour. Tidal current velocities are on average around 0.22 ms-¹, with flood tide velocities stronger on the south side of the harbour and ebb tide velocities stronger on the north side, inducing a clockwise circulation pattern. External factors are an important component in the tidal driving forces, comprising coastal weather patterns and a continental shelf edge wave oscillation effect with a period of 2.5 - 3.5 hours. These external influences are the main cause of the duration of both ebb and flood tides varying from 5.0 to 8.25 hours. Interaction between tidal currents and the harbour geometry induces a large gyre in the outer harbour which varies in duration from being absent to operating for up to 50% of any given tidal cycle. The transport of sand sized material is bidirectional along the harbour length, with erosion of sandy sediments in the centre of the harbour, and deposition at the head of the harbour and at the harbour entrance. Fine muddy sediments are transported predominantly towards the harbour entrance and accumulate in the channel, on the northern side, and in the entrance, forming fluid mud layers. The most concentrated fluid mud regions coincide with the rotatory currents at both ends of the tidal gyre, where sediment is deposited from weaker currents. Transport of sand across the harbour is not apparent, although lateral movement of fine, suspended particles occurs by advection and diffusion in response to the sediment flux differentials and flux gradients within the harbour. This movement of fines results in the lateral gradation of grain size, from coarse to fine, across the harbour from south to north. The major sedimentary process within the harbour is the maintenance dredging programme which removes up to 1,000,000 tonnes of sediment annually from the channel and port berthage areas. The dredge spoil is subsequently dumped within the harbour along the northern perimeter, although a temporal analysis of dump sites indicated that once a site capacity has been attained, all the spoil dumped at that location is rapidly removed. Sediment input from other sources, primarily erosion of the catchment, has been estimated at less than 45,000 tonnes per annum, substantially less than the channel siltation rate, and the recirculation of dredge spoil was identified as the primary source of sediment causing channel siltation. Two processes induce spoil recirculation. Firstly the tidal gyre, and secondly the dynamic trap. The dynamic trap system provides a mechanism for the transport of fine grained sediments to regions of high sediment flux, and for the deposition of fine grained sediments under current regimes having both a high competence and a high capacity. The system provides an explanation for the lateral grain size gradation within the harbour, the maintenance of dredge spoil mounds at dump sites, the insensitivity of channel siltation rates to the location of spoil dumping sites around the harbour, and the quasi-equilibrium state of the harbour in spite of the extensive dredging operations. Little sediment is able to escape from the harbour to the open sea due to the flux gradients at the entrance, and the dynamic trap principles. Thus the long term stability of Lyttelton Harbour is maintained, under both natural and dredging conditions, by the redistribution of available sediment within the harbour as a function of internal harbour dynamics. Throughout the thesis the dynamics of Lyttelton Harbour are compared to existing inlet concepts and theories in order to identify those areas in which this type of inlet is significantly different and where other, poorly understood inlets may be comparable to Lyttelton. Finally, Lyttelton Harbour is defined and classified and a set of principles pertaining to this type of inlet are proposed.
机译:这项研究的主要关注点是检查Lyttelton Harbour岩壁潮汐进口中的沉积和沉积过程。该海港与文献中通常讨论的其他形式的进水口不同,主要是由于淡水输入量微不足道,与当前水流路径平行的横向粒度轮廓以及维护,挖泥程序,大大超过了自然海港的沉积速率。港口的另一个不寻常的特征是周围的刚性岩石边界对港口内的过程施加了横向限制。这些边界通过过程和几何之间的相互作用影响和控制港口内的环流模式。因此,Lyttelton Harbor是一个结构受控的潮汐进口。可以自由响应系统变化的唯一港口边界是河床。由于这些原因,发现适用于河口和边界不固定的入口的传统入口概念对于解释Lyttelton Harbor的运行方式并不令人满意。研究方法涉及野外调查以及对港口内沉积和水力过程的分析。床层沉积物调查显示,港口可沿其纵轴划分,北侧为极细的泥沙沉积物,南侧为较粗的沙性沉积物。所有床层沉积物基本上都很好,对近床层悬浮沉积物浓度的调查显示,在海港北侧,港口入口处和河道内有流体泥浆层。主要的水力过程是潮流,尽管包括海浪和局部产生的风波在内的混合波场通常会渗入港口。潮汐速度平均约为0.22 ms-1,潮汐速度在港口南侧更强,潮汐速度在北侧更强,从而形成顺时针环流模式。外部因素是潮汐驱动力的重要组成部分,包括沿海天气模式和大陆架边缘波振荡效应,持续时间为2.5-3.5小时。这些外部影响是潮汐持续时间从5.0到8.25小时不等的主要原因。潮流与港口几何形状之间的相互作用在外部港口中引起了一个大的回旋,其持续时间从不存在到运行的任何给定潮汐周期的最多50%不等。沙粒大小的物料沿港口长度方向是双向的,港口中心的砂质沉积物受到侵蚀,并在港口顶部和港口入口处沉积。细的泥沙主要流向港口入口,并在河道,北侧和入口处积聚,形成流体泥层。流体泥浆最集中的区域与潮汐旋流两端的旋转流相吻合,在那里,沉积物由较弱的流沉积。尽管细小,悬浮颗粒的横向运动是通过平流和扩散而发生的,但并未响应沙尘在整个港口的运输。细粒的移动导致了从南到北穿过港口的晶粒尺寸的横向渐变,从粗到细。港口内的主要沉积过程是维护疏program计划,该计划每年可从航道和港口停泊区清除多达100万吨的沉积物。随后对挖泥机进行弃渣,将其沿北界倾倒在海港内,尽管对倾倒场的时间分析表明,一旦达到站点容量,就可以迅速清除在该位置倾倒的所有弃渣。据估计,其他来源的沉积物投入(主要是流域的侵蚀)每年少于45,000吨,大大低于航道的淤积速度,疏dr弃土的再循环被确定为造成航道淤积的主要沉积物来源。有两个过程会导致废料再循环。首先是潮流环流,其次是动态圈闭。动态捕集器系统提供了一种机制,用于将细颗粒的沉积物输送到高沉积物通量的区域,并在具有高能力和高能力的当前制度下沉积细颗粒的沉积物。该系统为港口内的横向粒度分级,倾卸场的挖泥土堆的维护,河道淤积率对港口周围弃土场的位置不敏感以及港口的准平衡状态提供了解释。尽管进行了广泛的疏ging作业,但仍存在港口。由于入口处的通量梯度,几乎没有沉积物能够从港口逸出到公海,以及动态陷阱原理。因此,在自然和疏dynamic条件下,通过根据港口内部动态重新分配港口内可用沉积物,可以保持Lyttelton港口的长期稳定性。在整个论文中,将Lyttelton Harbour的动态与现有的进水口概念和理论进行了比较,以确定那些类型的进水口明显不同且其他未充分了解的进水口可以与Lyttelton媲美的区域。最后,对Lyttelton Harbor进行了定义和分类,并提出了与这种类型的进水口相关的一组原理。

著录项

  • 作者

    Curtis R. J.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1985
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号