首页> 外文OA文献 >Liberalism, republicanism, and John Milton's late political thought
【2h】

Liberalism, republicanism, and John Milton's late political thought

机译:自由主义,共和主义和约翰·弥尔顿的晚期政治思想

摘要

Many critics regard the late Milton as a republican, while others consider him a liberal. This is problematic, for prominent political historians argue that republican political thought is distinct from liberal political thought. How, then, can Milton be both a republican and a liberal? I have contributed to the answer of this question by examining Milton's late political thought in A Treatise of Civil Power (1659) and The Ready and Easy Way (second edition, April, 1660). John Locke may be legitimately regarded as having presented a definitive statement of liberal political thought. Thus, after presenting a comprehensive definition of liberalism, as it was formulated by Locke, we can see that Milton, in Of Civil Power, conforms with liberal political thought in a number of ways. Like Locke, Milton argues, on the one hand, that the state should not use force in matters of religion, but on the other hand argues that Catholics should not be tolerated by the state. Because Milton's political thought in Of Civil Power is the same in many important respects as Locke's political thought, there are strong grounds for thinking of Milton as a liberal in this tract. There are, however, no grounds for thinking of Milton as a republican in this tract. By taking the arguments of Machiavelli as their model, Skinner and Pocock provide us with a comprehensive definition of republican political thought. Milton's political thought in The Ready and Easy Way is both consistent and inconsistent in a number of ways with both republican and liberal political thought. But this tract is more liberal than republican because the liberal notion that humans have a God-given natural freedom that government must protect is more prominent in this pamphlet than the republican notion that personal freedom is a privilege that must be earned. Like Locke, Milton also defends religious freedom and emphasises its importance, and he never expresses the republican notion of religion as a mere political tool. Moreover, like Locke, Milton expresses a Christian vision of history, which contrasts with Machiavelli's cyclical view of history. Overall, then, Milton is more of a liberal than a republican in The Ready and Easy Way.
机译:许多批评家认为已故的弥尔顿是共和党人,而另一些批评家则认为他是自由主义者。这是有问题的,因为著名的政治历史学家认为共和党的政治思想与自由主义的政治思想不同。那么,弥尔顿如何既可以成为共和主义者又可以成为自由主义者?我通过在《民权论》(1659年)和《通俗易懂的方式》(第二版,1660年4月)中考察弥尔顿的晚期政治思想,为这一问题的答案做出了贡献。约翰·洛克(John Locke)有可能被合理地认为是对自由主义政治思想的明确陈述。因此,在提出洛克所定义的自由主义的全面定义之后,我们可以看到《民权》中的弥尔顿在许多方面符合自由主义政治思想。像洛克一样,米尔顿一方面主张国家不应在宗教事务上使用武力,但另一方面则认为国家不应容忍天主教徒。由于弥尔顿在《民权》中的政治思想在许多重要方面与洛克的政治思想相同,因此在这一领域将弥尔顿视为自由主义者有很强的根据。但是,没有理由认为米尔顿是这一领域的共和党人。斯金纳和波考克以马基雅维利的论点为模型,为我们提供了共和政治思想的全面定义。弥尔顿的《现成的简便方法》中的政治思想与共和和自由主义政治思想在许多方面都是一致的和不一致的。但是,这一领域比共和党更为自由,因为在本手册中,人类具有上帝必须赋予政府的自然自由的自由观念比共和党认为个人自由是必须获得的特权更为突出。像洛克一样,米尔顿也捍卫宗教自由并强调宗教自由,他从未将共和主义的宗教观念表达为纯粹的政治工具。此外,与洛克一样,米尔顿也表达了基督教的历史观,这与马基雅维利的周期性历史观形成了鲜明的对比。总体而言,米尔顿在《乐在助人》中更像是一个自由主义者,而不是共和党人。

著录项

  • 作者

    Clark Nathan L.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2000
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号