首页> 外文OA文献 >Cost-Effectiveness and Performance of Overlay Systems in Illinois Volume 2: Guidelines for Interlayer System Selection Decision When Used in HMA Overlays
【2h】

Cost-Effectiveness and Performance of Overlay Systems in Illinois Volume 2: Guidelines for Interlayer System Selection Decision When Used in HMA Overlays

机译:伊利诺斯州覆盖系统的成本效益和性能第2卷:Hma覆盖中使用的层间系统选择决策指南

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In an effort to control reflective cracking in hot-mix asphalt (HMA) overlays placed over Portland CementConcrete (PCC) pavements, several reflective crack control (RCC) systems, including interlayer systems,have been used. However, the cost-effectiveness of interlayer systems is still in doubt due their performanceand additional costs. In this project, a decision making procedure to aid in the selection of cost-effectiveinterlayer systems was developed. As a core step in evaluating the benefit-cost ratio (B/C) of interlayersystems, a user-friendly life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) program, CIND (Cost-effective INterlayer systemDecision program) was developed. Based on sensitivity analysis, a B/C prediction model was proposed, whichtakes into account a performance benefit ratio (PBR) parameter, a material cost ratio (MCR), and aconstruction time ratio (CTR). Using the B/C model, a table was developed which allows the user todetermine the most cost-effective interlayer system in a rehabilitation project for a given equivalent single-axleload (ESAL) level, representative low temperature (TL), and existing concrete pavement joint spacing (JS).Finally, a decision making tree was constructed to simplify the process of determining the most cost-effectiveand compatible interlayer system for a given project. Depending on project significance and/or informationavailability, pavement engineers can select from one of three newly developed B/C evaluation tools (in orderof sophistication): application tables, B/C prediction model, and the CIND computer program. Using thesetools, it was found that B/C increases as PBR increases or MCR and CTR decrease. In general, System D iscost-effective in a wide range of ESALs and TL values; especially in a cold region with lower traffic volume.The application range is reduced with the increase of JS, however. System E is relatively cost-effective only inwarm regions having higher traffic volume.
机译:为了控制放置在波特兰水泥混凝土(PCC)路面上的热拌沥青(HMA)覆盖层中的反射裂缝,已使用了几种反射裂缝控制(RCC)系统,包括夹层系统。但是,由于中间层系统的性能和额外成本,其成本效益仍然值得怀疑。在该项目中,制定了有助于选择具有成本效益的中间层系统的决策程序。作为评估中间层系统的成本效益比(B / C)的核心步骤,开发了用户友好的生命周期成本分析(LCCA)程序CIND(经济高效的层间系统决策程序)。基于敏感性分析,提出了一种B / C预测模型,该模型考虑了性能效益比(PBR)参数,材料成本比(MCR)和施工时间比(CTR)。使用B / C模型,开发了一张表,使用户可以在给定的等效单轴载荷(ESAL)水平,代表性低温(TL)和现有混凝土路面的情况下,确定修复项目中最具成本效益的夹层系统最后,构建决策树以简化确定给定项目的最具成本效益和兼容性的中间层系统的过程。根据项目的重要性和/或信息的可用性,路面工程师可以从三种最新开发的B / C评估工具(按复杂程度排序)中进行选择:应用程序表,B / C预测模型和CIND计算机程序。使用这些工具,发现B / C随着PBR的增加或MCR和CTR的减少而增加。通常,系统D在广泛的ESAL和TL值中具有成本效益。特别是在交通流量较低的寒冷地区。但是,随着JS的增加,其应用范围也会缩小。系统E仅在交通流量较大的温暖地区相对具有成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号