首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Elkhead Reservoir Escapement Recovery Program Project No: 118 Investigation of Nonnative Fish Escapement from Elkhead Reservoir
【24h】

Elkhead Reservoir Escapement Recovery Program Project No: 118 Investigation of Nonnative Fish Escapement from Elkhead Reservoir

机译:麋鹿水库塌陷恢复计划项目编号:118 Elkhead水库非本地鱼类擒纵的调查

获取原文

摘要

Escapement of non-native fish from Elkhead Reservoir has been identified as a potential impact to listed fish in the Yampa River. Fish escapement from the reservoir was included in the 2001 work plan for Elkhead Reservoir enlargement studies conducted by Miller Ecological Consultants, Inc. Miller and Laiho (1997) recommended study of escapement prior to the selecting an escapement control device. The potential cost of building and installing a flexible, Kevlar-like net, suspended in the water column to minimize fish escapement from Elkhead Reservoir is estimated near $1 million. It is presumed that annual operating and maintenance of this screen will also be significant. These potential costs compel an evaluation of fish escapement as a pre-requisite task to justify this investment in both the recovery of the endangered Colorado River fishes and the reservoir sportfishery. Miller Ecological Consultants, Inc. collected aquatic resource information in fall of 1995 on Elkhead Creek for fish and macroinvertebrates (Miller and Rees 1996). Two sites were studied, one downstream of the reservoir and one upstream of the reservoir. The data provided baseline information for the stream aquatic resources downstream and upstream of Elkhead Reservoir. Results of this survey demonstrated the presence of small numbers black crappie and bluegill, and relatively abundant smallmouth bass in the creek near the dam outlet. Most bass were 30-95 mm in length with only four of 192 fish exceeding 100 mm. Colorado Division of Wildlife collected data on the reservoir fishery in 1999 (Bill Elmblad, CDOW personal communication). They sampled with electrofishing and gill nets. The results of that survey showed that approximately 80% of the fish captured were nonnative game species. Nonnative white sucker made up the largest segment of nongame fish (15%). No native fish were collected in the reservoir. The reservoir was again sampled in 2001 (Miller Ecological 2004), and results on relative abundance confirmed those of CDOW, showing smallmouth bass, black crappie and bluegill to be the most common species. Miller Ecological Consultants conducted a preliminary escapement study during the summer and fall of 2001 but due to the short runoff period, data were not collected during runoff (Miller Ecological 2004). It was hypothesized that the potential for escapement is greatest during the snowmelt runoff period from May through June. This study provides results from monitoring escapement during runoff in 2003 and 2004.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号