首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Efficacite des Heuristiques et du Recuit Simule pour l'Ordonnancement de TachesConcurrentes: Une Comparaison Empirique (Effectiveness of Heuristics and Simulated Annealing for the Scheduling of Concurrent Tasks: An Empirical Comparison)
【24h】

Efficacite des Heuristiques et du Recuit Simule pour l'Ordonnancement de TachesConcurrentes: Une Comparaison Empirique (Effectiveness of Heuristics and Simulated Annealing for the Scheduling of Concurrent Tasks: An Empirical Comparison)

机译:Efficacite des Heuristiques et du Recuit simule pour l'Ordonnancement de TachesConcurrentes:Une Comparaison Empirique(启发式和模拟退火对于并发任务调度的有效性:实证比较)

获取原文

摘要

The scheduling of concurrent tasks with precedence constraints in parallelsystems in order to minimize the makespan is known to be NP complete. The average effectiveness and the average efficiency of 27 heuristic and 7 simulated annealing algorithms used for the minimization of makespan are studied. A computational experiment showed that the simulated annealing algorithms are very effective compared with the heuristics, provided these algorithms converge. It turns out that some heuristics are quite effective on average, and that the heuristics, provided they are used together, have qualitative behavior not much worse than that of the simulated annealing and are much more efficient.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号