首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Pulsed Injection Flow Control for Throttling in Supersonic Nozzles - A Computational Fluid Dynamics Design Study (Preprint)
【24h】

Pulsed Injection Flow Control for Throttling in Supersonic Nozzles - A Computational Fluid Dynamics Design Study (Preprint)

机译:用于超音速喷嘴节流的脉冲喷射流量控制 - 计算流体动力学设计研究(预印本)

获取原文

摘要

A vehicle propelled by an engine with a variable geometry nozzle allows the nozzle expansion ratio to vary with altitude and flight condition, thereby optimizing engine performance. Active flow control offers a method of providing the functionality of a variable throat area system without requiring variable geometry. Throttling the mass flow rate through the nozzle throat controls the effective throat area, subsequently controlling the effective expansion ratio of the overall nozzle. This paper presents findings from the Pulsed Injection for Rocket Flow Control Technology (PIRFCT) program, which evaluated potential gains in the overall performance of a rocket using active flow control to optimize nozzle expansion ratio for an Earth to orbit mission. Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company utilized Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to simulate the rocket nozzle with active flow control. Simulations were performed with steady and pulsed flow control jets which were oriented near the geometric throat and inclined upstream against the primary flow. A low stagnation pressure, steady, tertiary injection stream when combined with a steady, high momentum secondary injector was witnessed to increase throttling performance beyond that of a secondary injector alone. Nozzle discharge coefficient was largely unaffected by changes in pulsation frequency or pulsation duty cycle. Pulsed injection approached, but did not exceed, the throttling performance of a time invariant injector when compared on a equivalent mass flux, momentum flux, and energy flux basis. Simulations incorporating a single injector and large area modulations predicted a 50% area reduction when injecting approximately 18% baseline reference mass flow at Mach 2 conditions. However, the PIRFCT program concluded that secondary injection at the nozzle throat is not a good candidate for this type of throttling/altitude compensation technology for an Earth to orbit mission.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号