首页> 外文期刊>PharmacoEconomics >Cost-effectiveness analysis of prophylactic lamivudine use in preventing vertical transmission of hepatitis B virus infection.
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness analysis of prophylactic lamivudine use in preventing vertical transmission of hepatitis B virus infection.

机译:预防性使用拉米夫定预防乙肝病毒感染垂直传播的成本效益分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: As neonates born to mothers with positive hepatitis B e antigen may not be completely protected by hepatitis B vaccination, prophylactic lamivudine use in mothers with high viraemia has been proposed. However, the overall effectiveness and the balance between cost and benefit for such a prophylactic strategy have rarely been addressed. OBJECTIVE: Using a review of recent literature, we aimed to assess the cost effectiveness, from the Taiwanese societal perspective, of administering prophylactic lamivudine to mothers to reduce vertical transmission of hepatitis B virus and its long-term sequelae in neonates. METHODS: A meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of lamivudine versus placebo. A Markov decision model was constructed in which in both treatment arms infants received active and passive immunoprophylaxis. An economic evaluation was performed to calculate costs, acute infections averted, and QALYs gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted and a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve drawn. All these analyses were from the societal perspective. Costs (Dollars US) were valued in year 2008 prices. RESULT: Supplemental lamivudine use gained an additional 0.0024 QALYs and averted 0.23 acute infections per birth compared with the routine active-passive immunization without lamivudine. The cost-effectiveness analysis suggested that the use of additional prophylactic lamivudine dominated the routine strategy. The acceptability curve suggested that the probability of being cost effective under the willingness-to-pay threshold of Dollars US20,000 was 94%. CONCLUSION: This analysis suggests that supplemental use of lamivudine in mothers with high hepatitis B viraemia is effective in reducing vertical transmission and may be cost effective, from a Taiwanese societal perspective, compared with the routine active-passive immunization without lamivudine.
机译:背景:由于乙型肝炎e抗原阳性的母亲所生的新生儿可能无法通过乙型肝炎疫苗完全保护,因此,有人建议对高病毒血症母亲使用预防性拉米夫定。但是,这种预防策略的总体有效性和成本与收益之间的平衡很少得到解决。目的:通过回顾最近的文献,我们旨在从台湾社会的角度评估对母亲使用预防性拉米夫定以减少新生儿乙型肝炎病毒及其长期后遗症的成本效益。方法:对三项随机对照试验进行荟萃分析,以评估拉米夫定与安慰剂的疗效。建立了马尔可夫决策模型,其中在两个治疗组中,婴儿均接受了主动和被动免疫预防。进行了经济评估以计算成本,避免了急性感染并获得了QALY。进行了概率敏感性分析,并绘制了成本效益可接受性曲线。所有这些分析都是从社会角度出发的。成本(美元(美国美元))按2008年价格计算。结果:与不使用拉米夫定的常规主动-被动免疫相比,补充使用拉米夫定可额外获得0.0024 QALYs,并且避免了每出生0.23例急性感染。成本效益分析表明,常规策略主要使用其他预防性拉米夫定。可接受性曲线表明,在20,000美元的支付意愿门槛下,具有成本效益的概率为94%。结论:这项分析表明,与不使用拉米夫定的常规主动-被动免疫相比,从台湾社会的角度来看,在乙型肝炎高病毒血症母亲中补充使用拉米夫定可有效减少垂直传播,并且可能具有成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号